Ars Technica have a zillion articles reporting on Apple's little event yesterday. The most interesting is "Apple's AI promise: “Your data is never stored or made accessible to Apple”. As always I don't give a shit what the article itself says so let's head straight to the comments.
It turns out the tech savvy geniuses who comment on Ars Technica articles would trust Apple with their lives, and anyone doubting Apple's security motives is torn apart.
Top comments:
Too many lies - from you and everyone else.
I'm sorry Apple, but I don't believe anyone that makes these kinds of claims... [downmarseyd to shit]
I'll be fascinated by your audit results, and am impressed at how quickly you work. [top comment]
no you have to blindly trust Apple
This is a nice change of pace, given recent events from companies like Abode, instead of the standard
<insert accent="" here="" russian=""></insert>
In Capitalist America, corporation monetizes YOU!!
Just a reminder that Ars users believe they're the most intelligent commenters on the Internet, and even Reddit-tier comments like this don't introduce self-doubt.
Do you for a fricking second believe them? Like really? [downmarseyd to shit]
Yes, because not everything is a conspiracy.
It may turn out that Apple are wrong, but I don't believe they're lying, because that would be incredibly stupid of them. [top comment]
I tend to trust companies to act in their own enlightened self-interest. In Apple's case, that mostly means they have more to lose from a leak indicating their privacy claims are ingenuous than they have to gain from whatever they might do with people's personal data.
Yeh everyone knows that personal data isn't useful to companies
Very curious how it's at all possible to reliably verify the code running on a remote machine. [downmarseyd to shit]
Isn't that the entire premise of Open Source? How can you reliably verify the code running anywhere? [top comment]
Suspend disbelief? That's asking a lot. We shall see… [downmarseyd to shit]
What has Apple done in the last 10 years that requires you to suspend disbelief? I haven't heard of anything that would break my trust in them. [top comment]
TRUST APPLE
"You should totally believe us". [downmarseyd to shit]
Their architecture documents are public. [top comment]
Everyone knows that architecture documents are legally binding and definitely reflect what's actually running.
These guys are fricking idiots.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You pay apple a lot of money to avoid spyware while windows is basically free (either comes with your computer or it can be easily spoofed with MAS which i think is just deliberate at this point since MS knows they'll make back the money with ads and selling data morso then a single license) !applechads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Apple has started to go down the dark path with their services revenue push driving ads and targeting a bit tho
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I swear MAS cracked windows runs slower. I heard MS basically let the OS get cracked to prevent compromised versions from being shared
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Idk i used a cracked w11 pro and didn't notice any difference in speed from my free w11 home upgrade. I just think actual os license sales are no longer Microsoft's major money maker like they were back in the win7 days
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context