Unable to load image

C nearly spared molestation from furroids because they spent so long arguing that ISO told them to frick off :marseyxd: :marseywholesome:

https://web.archive.org/web/20240715144349/https://www.iso.org/standard/82075.html

Reinstated :marseyitsover: but this is the sort of quality you can expect from the modern programming sphere.

>NOOOOOOOOO! YOU WILL USE MY OVERENGINEERED VERSION OF XXD INSTEAD OF DIRECTLY LINKING!

:soysnooseethetalking:

>Yeah. I'll just frick with the semantics of realloc(0). It's not like we need backwards compatability or anything.

:marseysmoothbraintalking:

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're going to need a better summary than a link to an index page

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Status: Deleted

>Stage: Project cancelled

How more explicit does it need to be? They missed the publishing deadline. :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They missed the publishing deadline.

what did? you :marseywhirlyhat:

just pretend you're not a C programmer and think of how humans communicate

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is like asking a goldfish to imagine landing an airplane

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The technical committee for the next version of the C standard (C23) :marseyfacepalm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ohhh THAT ISO/IEC DIS 9899

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah. It's really easy to get confused. There's like 6 million ISO standards for the C language every five minutes. If only they could boil it down to a singular filing every few years that everyone cares about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is it interesting everytime a proposal somehwere in the world gets canceled, or is there something that makes this unique?

Are there hysterical oppositing camps?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's the next C standard. You have a point though, if it's not ANSI or C99 - nobody cares.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not saying that this is less or more relevant than some other body. I have no idea. I'm saying give us some background so we can be invested in the drama.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Next C Standard team is filled with furroids and other weirdos

>Insert a bunch of controversial decisions into the standard

>Argue for so long that they miss the submission date to ISO and nearly get the entire thing cancelled

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.