Unable to load image

GOOGLE LOST AN ANTITRUST, NO LONGER ABLE TO PAY TO BE DEFAULT SEARCH ENGINE ON PHONES

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/05/technology/google-antitrust-ruling.html

DIE GOOGIE DIE

WITHER AWAY AND DIE

"Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly," Judge Mehta said in his ruling.

116
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does the judge know what a monopoly is? hmmmm If I could choose my electric company, that would be great.


Krayon sexually assaulted his sister. https://i.rdrama.net/images/17118241526738973.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17118241426254768.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17156480765435808.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Monopoly is when a corporation has ~40% market share according to the people who shrieked about Disney buying 20th century Fox.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

40% share is a pretty good rule, it makes it impossible for a company to hoard and grow while the country fails

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im half a libertarian but I'm all for strict anti super mega Corp enforcement

Let the courts cuck them, they are almost never good businesses by the time they are anywhere near an anti trust courtroom. There should be way more of these cases.

The only exception is the prices Amazon offers for shipping, they can't touch that one, I don't care how many dead Nigerians were involved in making that happen

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am pretty sure the courts give leeway to the extent that we won't notice your monopoly as long as it actually keeps making things better, but the moment you start failing or hoarding too much and slowing things down, we are coming for you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

except ISPs, energy companies, and Wall St

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Which is a good thing?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im half a libertarian but I'm all for strict anti super mega Corp enforcement

This is always something that's bugged me about lolberts. I can get behind limiting the power of government, that makes a lot of sense, but once corps get large enough they can behave as de facto governments and influence governments in ways it would be impossible for the average person or group to counter. If you want to kneecap the government's ability to interfere with your freedom, you should be wary of any large group or structure, not just the state.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

once corps get large enough they can behave as de facto governments and influence governments in wa

They get that power from government. Regulation is fricking another great avenue for them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Surely, if the government ended all regulation tomorrow, the people with the most access to capital, resources, and manpower wouldn't use those to further their own interests at the expense of others

:#marseycluelesstalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cut it down to 50%, and things would be fricking fine.

Got any other vague nonsense you're scared of, b-word?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Surely, if regulation was reduced, the people with the most access to capital, resources, and manpower wouldn't ensure it benefits them over everyone else

:#marseybrainlettalking:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

LINO moment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its any situation i say it is and Im always right and everyone who disagrees with me is a commie, progressive, or late stage capitalism deserving of gulag.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.