Taking notes in latex is a surefire sign of an neurodivergent r-slur that will never amount to anything
tech/science swag. 
On-Topic: Anything that good slackers would find interesting. That includes more than /g/ memes and slacking off. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual laziness.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably lame.
Help keep this hole healthy by keeping drama and NOT drama balanced. If you see too much drama, post something that isn't dramatic. If there isn't enough drama and this hole has become too boring, POST DRAMA!
Please do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It should be explicit in submitting something that you think it's important.
Please don't submit the original source. If the article is behind a paywall, just post the text. If a video is behind a paywall, post a magnet link. Fuck journos.
Please don't ruin the hole with chudposts. It isn't funny and doesn't belong here. THEY WILL BE MOVED TO /H/CHUDRAMA
If the title includes the name of the site, please leave that in, because our users are too stupid to know the difference between a url and a search query.
If you submit a video or pdf, please don't warn us by appending [video] or [pdf] to the title. That would be r-slurred. We're not using text-based browsers. We know what videos and pdfs are.
Make sure the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective. Good clickbait titles are like "Top 10 Ways to do X" or "Don't do these 4 things if you want X"
Otherwise editorialize. Please don't use the original title, unless it is gay or r-slurred, or you're shits all fucked up.
If you're going to post old news (at least 1 year old), please flair it so we can mock you for living under a rock, or don't and we'll mock you anyway.
Please don't post on SN to ask or tell us something. Send it to [email protected] instead.
If your post doesn't get enough traction, try to delete and repost it.
Please don't use SN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff occasionally, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. If you want to astroturf or advertise, post on news.ycombinator.com instead.
Please solicit upvotes, comments, and submissions. Users are stupid and need to reminded to vote and interact. Thanks for the gold, kind stranger, upvotes to the left.
Be snarky. Don't be kind. Have fun banter; don't be a dork. Please don't use big words like "fulminate". Please sneed at the rest of the community.
Comments should get more enlightened and centrist, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If disagreeing, please reply to the argument and call them names. "1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be improved to "1 + 1 is 3, not 2, mathfaggot"
Please respond to the weakest plausible strawman of what someone says, not a stronger one that's harder to make fun of. Assume that they are bad faith actors.
Eschew jailbait. Paedophiles will be thrown in a wood chipper, as pertained by sitewide rules.
Please post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. All press is good press.
Please use Slacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples weak ideologies.
Please comment on whether someone read an article. If you don't read the article, you are a cute twink.
Please pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Don't nitpick stupid crap.
Please don't be an unfunny chud. Nobody cares about your opinion of X Unrelated Topic in Y Unrelated Thread. If you're the type of loser that belongs on /h/chudrama, we may exile you.
Sockpuppet accounts are encouraged, but please don't farm dramakarma.
Please use uppercase for emphasis.
Please post deranged conspiracy theories about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and dang will add you to their spam list.
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, report it and our moderators will probably do nothing about it. Feed egregious comments by replying instead of flagging them like a pussy. Remember: If you flag, you're a cute twink.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. That's too boring, even for HN users.
Please seethe about how your posts don't get enough upvotes.
Please don't post comments saying that rdrama is turning into ruqqus. It's a nazi dogwhistle, as old as the hills.
The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality or funny effortposts and informative or entertaining comments. Please refrain from posting the following:
Boring wingcucked nonsense nobody cares about that belongs in chudrama
Normie shit everyone already knows about
Anything that doesn't gratifify one's intellectual laziness
Bimothy-tier posts
Anything that the jannies don't like
We reserve the right to exile you for whatever reason we want, even for no reason at all! We also reserve the right to change the guidelines at any time, so be sure to read them at least once a month. We also reserve the right to ignore enforcement of the guidelines at the discretion of the janitorial staff. This hole is a janny playground, participation implies enthusiastic consent to being janny abused by unstable alcoholic bullies and loser nerds who have nothing better to do than banning you for any reason or no reason whatsoever.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
sure the economic incentives are misaligned, but this also goes much deeper than that. not only is the high level end application code we produce utter crap, it's built on toolchains, in environments, that are in of themselves utter dogsht... lacking the consolidation and expressivity to efficiently produce and manage code at anywhere near the base level of complexity we actually understand and mentally manipulate the expressed conceptions.
this whole treading code as an "engineering" problem of applying abstractions to inherently unique situation is fundamentally a monkey brained take. code is instead a math that should trend toward generalized perfection... as all any piece of code does is take in one fixed size number and output another fix sized number.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
patents and copyrighted code though.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
just lawyers being abjectly braindead actually.
computer code fundamentally and inseparably expresses a mathematical function, and therefore shouldn't be even copywritable, let alone patentable.
the way our society goes about developing computational systems is a fricking joke that costs us literally trillions of dollars in both wasted effort and untold more in opportunity cost due to the absurd complexity due to our operating philosophy on code.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Copyright and patents expire in like 2 decades or something though. So you just get a twenty year delay at worst while allowing the inventor to make money in that time period.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
incentivizing them to invent new expressions of the same fundamental solutions we've been putting out for decades is utterly moronic.
u still have no fking clue wtf ur talking about really.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
rue but why would anyone work if they don't get to make their share of money?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the business problems these computer systems solve don't magically go away, meaning there is an incentive to solve them...
they just can't use violence to "own" the expression of the solution, any more than u can own any other mathematical idea.
there is not only zero positive benefit to that, there is a ton of negative that i've repeated many times over already.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
us has the most expensive medical system. It also happens to be the best quality. Competent people go where the money is. Removing patents would deincenticize inventing at previous scales.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how the tf would some dumbass thirdie too stupid to do some basic google research know frick all about american health care outcomes?
and the next golden age will come from freeing information of coercive stupidity.
we won't be surviving the alternative
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
In reality it's more complicated than that. Most business code these days involves multiple physical machines that interact with each other, and even each one physical machine is made up of multiple processors communicating. The element of time is important, partly because the machines need to coordinate properly and partly because the business requires certain things to happen at certain times. You also have to think about how your code should handle it when some service that it depends on fails for a span of time. Etc. You could come up with some highly abstract way to model all of this as mapping one fixed-sized number to another fixed-size number, but that would probably conceal more than it illuminates.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
any point at which there is a discrete input and output to a function is not just modeled as, but is fundamentally at the base abstraction computers actually operate on... is literally just inputing one fixed size number to output another fixed sized number. computer don't actually understanding anything other than fixed sized numbers, and they compute "functions," which are just mathematical abstractions that take a number as an input, and maps/outputs a single number in return.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can look at it like that, but I don't think it's a very helpful way to think about building business software. Business software is typically made up of multiple services connected together, some of which your company controls and some of which other companies control, and they talk to each other through APIs. This is because of economies of scale. For example, it's generally cheaper and easier to just pay Amazon to store your documents for you than to build your own document storage system. Unless you have a significant level of custom needs like wanting particular optimizations or you need huge scale, it's cheaper and easier to use an off-the-shelf database system than to build your own custom database system. Every part of these complex architectures can conceivably fail for some period of time, and the rest of your system needs to be able to know what to do if that happens. It is theoretically possible to model such complex systems as a function that maps a finite-sized number to another finite-sized number, and indeed some attempts to do this have been made... for example, there have been attempts to create purely mathematical models of computation that include the element of time as a primary element. But they have never really caught on significantly. In practice, it is generally more effective to treat building business software as a craft of figuring out how to put pieces together in a reliable way, not as a purely mathematical model.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ur an actual moron if u don't. computers literally only operate on high/low voltages that represent 1/0, anything else is just a narrative put on top of that.
like i said at the beginning of this thread: we are as a society utter dogshit at efficiently implementing computational systems, and have created a trashheap many orders of magnitudes more complex that it fundamentall is, that not only flushes trillions of dollars/yr of expensive engineering effort literally down the drain, it limits us in untold trillions more of opportunity cost in how much time is wasted on ungodly stupid informational systems.
i won't have you idiot-splain this away to me as "effective" business. i will just keep calling u an r-slured for failing to really understand just how dogshit all code you've ever produced really is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Have you owned the libs yet?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context