A couple reflections on the quantum computing breakthrough we just announced...
— Satya Nadella (@satyanadella) February 19, 2025
Most of us grew up learning there are three main types of matter that matter: solid, liquid, and gas. Today, that changed.
After a nearly 20 year pursuit, we’ve created an entirely new state of… pic.twitter.com/Vp4sxMHNjc
A couple reflections on the quantum computing breakthrough we just announced...
Most of us grew up learning there are three main types of matter that matter: solid, liquid, and gas. Today, that changed.
After a nearly 20 year pursuit, we've created an entirely new state of matter, unlocked by a new class of materials, topoconductors, that enable a fundamental leap in computing.
It powers Majorana 1, the first quantum processing unit built on a topological core.
We believe this breakthrough will allow us to create a truly meaningful quantum computer not in decades, as some have predicted, but in years.
The qubits created with topoconductors are faster, more reliable, and smaller.
They are 1/100th of a millimeter, meaning we now have a clear path to a million-qubit processor.
Imagine a chip that can fit in the palm of your hand yet is capable of solving problems that even all the computers on Earth today combined could not!
Sometimes researchers have to work on things for decades to make progress possible.
It takes patience and persistence to have big impact in the world.
And I am glad we get the opportunity to do just that at Microsoft.
This is our focus: When productivity rises, economies grow faster, benefiting every sector and every corner of the globe.
It's not about hyping tech; it's about building technology that truly serves the world.
Majorana's theory proposed that a particle could be its own antiparticle, and may actually coexist rather than only annihalating each other
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Plasmacels continue to eat shit and die mad
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Actually a french lab recently got fusion to 22 minutes or some shit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Which design? I remember the pellet start had issues with consistent burning on both sides.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Whatever this is:
https://www.cea.fr/english/Pages/News/nuclear-fusion-west-beats-the-world-record-for-plasma-duration.aspx
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Tokamak not ICF
https://www.cea.fr/english/Pages/News/nuclear-fusion-west-beats-the-world-record-for-plasma-duration.aspx
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
reminder that even given all possible breakthroughs, the economics of fusion energy are equal or worse to those of fission (plants are expensive to build and operate, nuclear fuel already costs basically nothing) and the field owes its entire existence to hippie "nuclear waste" paranoia and physicists riding a research gravy train because the subject matter is cool.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have lost so much money angel investing in fusion startups. And it's not even my fault.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that's what you get for thinking real life is a 4X game tech tree, many such cases
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
probably the only fricking benefits of the fricking increasingly useless publish or die academia...
is fricking seeing rich idiots lose their money on fundamentally r-slurred ideas.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Links to reading on this? This and general economics of nuclear
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Links? Why do you need links when there's state of the art AI that has already read everything and can summarize into nice digestible answer.
@Bussy-boy care to educate us on the economics of fusion vs fission energy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Uhhh... No? Im busy. My 24/7 18k AI isn't free you know. I spend $35 a month for only a miniscule amount of free credits. Even then it takes 14 hours to process a paragraph on a 30 GB ram GPU. I'm not wasting my time to do this for you. Also I would do it if i was asked nicely, not insulted. Rude.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please educate us on the economics of fusion vs fission energy?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fusion has a higher initial cost to get up and running. However, the energy costs to keep it running are much lower. Fission energy has a higher output rate, but uses up fuel faster. This is why we're seeing so many plants shut down lately. It just doesn't make sense to use them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hmm...
@eager_potty seems that you've been

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
WE ARE THE 99% (of the universe)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
--poor people/ plasmalets
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bose-Einstein condencels on suicide watch
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context