emoji-award-marseyfirefox
Unable to load image

Mozilla Firef*x removes TOS about not selling user data

https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#diff-a24e74e4595fa85440a2f4e7e5dcfe68aba6e1e593aef05a2d35581a91423847

From orange site: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43200604

More orange site: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43194257

As per the recent introduction of "Terms of Use" for Firef*x which is covered by (almost) copyleft license, Mozilla now imposes following non-sense on it's users.

  • Mozilla now restricts users from watching or uploading sexuality explicit content through Firef*x

  • Mozilla can end anyone's access to Firef*x at any time for any reason

  • Mozilla owns royalty-free, unrestricted access to your inputs processed by Firef*x (like Search, Web History etc.)

  • Mozilla will submit collected data to law enforcement as per legal request (I still don't get why it has to collect the data in the first place)

  • Mozilla can change these ToS anytime and however they want

These are just a few bizarre conditions imposed by Mozilla. Even sadder part is we do not have alternatives right now except maybe LibreWolf and Tor Browser. Is there any actual piece of "user agent" software out there that works for user rather than corporate overlords?

ToS: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/terms/firef*x/

Anti-Privacy Policy: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firef*x/#bookmark-how-we-use-data

Acceptable Use Policy: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/acceptable-use/

More orangesite: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43194536

reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/firef*x/comments/1izcnl9/mozillas_new_terms_of_use_are_out_of_step_with

... rdrama: https://rdrama.net/h/slackernews/post/345893/mozzarella-has-a-new-tos-marseyfirefx

Didn't see this one before pinging 500 users :chudconcerned:. Well it's been developing. This is a good post :marseyrelieved: I like that github link. Wait that's the top comment in the rdrama thread. :marseyemojilaughupset:

80
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does it actually prohibit looking at big booba, or is that their exaggerated interpretation of a nothingburger

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm pretty sure they're implying that they can block you from looking at boobs based on what you've been looking at before. Also I'm betting they get a fricking lot of money in their bank account from it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Me: is this real or an assumption

You: well i assume that....

Thanks bussy-boy, very cool!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not saying they are fricking right, but I'm saying I'm going to assume they are fricking right. You can't just take my side like that, motherlover!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>You can't just take my side like that

Sure I can.

I just did.

You were there.

You saw me do it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok, I'm not going to lie, this is fricking pretty fricking funny. I like this. :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.