I hate the symbols in math so much. It just feels like unnecessary gatekeeping for trivial concepts. How many mathematical proofs could be made widely accessible with just a little bit of psuedocode?
— Franklin Lynam (@FranklinLynam) September 11, 2021
" notation in math feels like unnecessary gatekeeping , proofs must be written in pseudocode for-loops "
https://x.com/FranklinLynam/status/1436725720810758148
- 145
- 156
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No you still see standard math notation in computer science papers all the fucking time, this guy's just incredibly autistic
If nothing else, typesetting pseudocode in a paper takes at least a thousand times as long as
a_i\in\mathbb{Z}\ \forall\ i\in\{1,2,...,x\}\Rightarrow\exists\ \{b_1,b_2,...,b_x\}\in\mathbb{Z}\ :\ (\prod_{i=1}^{x}a_i\lambda(n)+1)=(\sum_{i=1}^{x}b_i\lambda(n)^i)+1
, which is already ugly enough, and god forbid you have to rearrange it at some pointJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there are plenty of latex packages for coding that are super easy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you're looking for something easy, you're in the wrong place. Coding is hard work and takes a lot of dedication. If you're not willing to put in the effort, you might as well give up now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
true that’s why i work at F@gman
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why don't you go work at McDonald's if you're so unhappy with your current job?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
TC or GTFO
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This comment is completely uncalled for and unacceptable. If you can't have a civil discussion without resorting to personal attacks, then you need to take a time out and come back when you can act like an adult.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
And also don't fit any publication's style requirements
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if self publishing is enough for flat earthers it’s enough for codecels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Using simple math logic symbols makes things so much clear and understandable. The math notation produce so much less clutter and shit than pseudocode.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't even know how you would show a logical inference in pseudocode either.
A implies B
is kind of a cornerstone of any math worth writing out Or do we need to learn a new syntax with different kinds of equal signs that no one will even agree onJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
....you mean this?
A | B |A->B
T | T | T
T | F | F
F | T | T
F | F | T
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah, but the problem with simple math logic symbols is that you have to do the work. With pseudocode, you just type it in, and the machine does all the work.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
$\sum_{n=1}^{n=4}\left(3n\right)^{4}$
rdrama natively supports LaTeX when?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah like has he never read a paper on ML or recsys or anything tangentially related? They love their notation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context