":sigmacap: notation in math feels like unnecessary gatekeeping :marseynails:, proofs must be written in pseudocode for-loops :marseyagree:"

https://twitter.com/FranklinLynam/status/1436725720810758148

:#marseyhesright:

![](/images/16578164433688195.webp)

156
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Based codecel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At first I wad mad, but I respect the follow up. Apologizing on the internet is for bitches, especially to Twitter pile-ons.

Why yes everyone except me is wrong. How could you tell? :gigachad2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the thing that gets me about math notation is why do they have to use the letters that rhyme? its always e, c, p, g, t, z, v so confusing.

n and m are the worse because they sound and look so similar especially when pronounced by some chinese phd student, yet theyre always used together in compsci. used to drive me insane

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hate the symbols in math so much.

Me too. But I'm a mathematical formalist.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As a mathematician, everyone in CompSci is an absolute brainlet and can go frick themselves. I love failing the compsci majors who have to take my Calculus classes and then complain the entire time that it's proof based.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Last semester I took an introductory cryptography class which was crosslisted such that it could be taken either as a math or a CS class. My university has a site where you can see the grade distributions for different courses and sections, so I took a look at that course and noticed something interesting in the data. The math section listing of the class had 2/3s of students getting As, while the CS listing had about the same proportion failing, how strange.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bruc, the most fun is failing the CS students in Discrete Math


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how could you plausibly fail discrete math lol, that shit was barely even a class and more like an enjoyable break from work

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

On every final. "Prove sqrt(5) is not rational." Then they give an example.


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How many in your class actually are going to use calculus at all? I think it's funny to have it as a way to weed out r-slurs but I had to take it twice (once for business once for comp sci) and I don't think I ever had to use it outside class, especially the ones with trig bullshit. I will say though that having a solid understanding of compound interest at a young age was beneficial.


https://i.postimg.cc/dVgyQgj2/image.png https://i.postimg.cc/d3Whbf0T/image.png

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Spoken like a true compsci chud. Want to know the fastest way to piss a professor off? Ask them "When will we use this IRL?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lambda calc is useful but the vast majority of codecels will either just copypaste that shit from github if they need it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>capital pi

finally, uppercase numbers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Someone should make this guy program in APL

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mathcels trying to stop their jobs from being automated away by programmercels

:#marseyreading::#marseylaugh::!#marppy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Progcels cant proof tho


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hate the mathemetarded.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

your gay little for loops are just summations, frick you codecels, learn lambda calculus b-word

>math is inscrutable nonsense, i can't understand it and I am smarter than others including Gauss

humblest codecel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Let’s remove all layers of abstractions and return to monke

:monke:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What a fricking r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Someone should show him Index or Einstein Notation. It's basically that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Soyboy beta cucks can't handle sigma notation

![](/images/16578236200335722.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The point of for loops being a notation for this in code is because we can't easily type out Summation in a text editor. Also For loops are a bit more advanced with what you can put in them.

Vice versa for math, you can't easily write out code on a paper, but you can definitely draw a big fat E sigma icon with scribbles on the sides.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

large scary math symbols

why do codecels have to be actual r-slurs. Math symbols are that way for a reason, for example people have to write them on blackboards and paper so terseness is important. If you cannot keep track of the meaning of a couple symbols you should have learned in high school then you are not intelligent enough to understand any actual mathematics.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would always frick up writing the Sigma symbol when trying to write fast


https://i.postimg.cc/dVgyQgj2/image.png https://i.postimg.cc/d3Whbf0T/image.png

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like the idea that they are scared of it solely because it's bigger, and I'm pretty sure a lot of people unironically think this way.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's a webshitter. Webshitters don't really do any math

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhesright:

t. brainlet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol easy fix, just use einstein notation, no :sigmacap: at all

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

God bless that notation, keeps my tensors clean :marseyembrace:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

he sounds dumb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"It would take way more time and space to express these 'simple' concepts with ur obtuse idea"

"Thats a horrible metric!" :marseyakshually:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17035381209726467.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I appreciate that being a woman, furry, and able to code is sufficient for 70k followers on Twitter.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well you know what you gotta do now to get that Twitter fame :marseyeggirl::marseyeggirl::marseyeggirl:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can’t code :marseysmoothbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Frick yall math nerd academic butt nigqas hes right, all the greek symbols are stupid and pseudocode makes more sense. And yeah before you ask I took 3 calc classes, diff eq and linear algebra which just reinforced my belief that math nerds are r-slurs who get off on thinking knowing all that shit makes them smart.

Maybe if you were so smart your asses wouldnt be broke lmfao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And yeah before you ask I took 3 calc classes, diff eq and linear algebra

Le C- face

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A pass is a pass maybe those A students should integrate some bitches into their lives :#marseyskeleton:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You would have an actual mental breakdown if you tried to solve an equation ivolving sigma notation with pseudocode. Just fricking imagine writing out all that redundant syntax like 20 times.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is 3 lines of interspersed numbers, letters, and brackets simpler than a big E?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I call the multiplication notation smegma (sigma but with a “M” for multiplication) and basically my entire signals class started using the term too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you mean Pi for product?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol.

That's literally capital Greek Pi for product though. Not the hardest thing to remember.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The problem is that it’s just called product which kinda sucks for explaining verbally to people. Tbf though most proofs make 0 sense explained out loud, you have to read them to follow.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's really sad that you have to resort to making up stupid names for things in order to feel superior. Grow up and learn to deal with reality.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bro I hate tech twitter ppl so bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:sigmacap: and :picap: are defined and always do the same. If I see those I know what they do.

If I see a for-loop I have to look at it and read it to understand it. Because not every for-loop can be replaced by a math symbol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

For loop can always be replaced. If there is gonna be a known amount of iterations. If you don't know use another form of iteration

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why would you want to replace a for loop with something else if it's going to be a known amount of iterations? That doesn't make any sense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean by the sigma notation. Then it is different thing about readability

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can do it. Looks like shit and barely readable. It be sum function that doesn't sum anything. But just does other shit inside it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, well maybe if you actually knew how to code you wouldn't be such a fricking moron. But since you're clearly an idiot, I'll spell it out for you: your code is garbage and barely readable because it doesn't do anything. So maybe you should learn how to code before you try and write any more.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you referring to loop unrolling? Because that would mean I have to even more code to notice if there's a small change from the "short" version.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

god forbid you look at the table in the front of the book that explains all these, these aren't even that hard of symbols. I hate the union operators where they have a "U" that is in all directions. was never able to read that one efficiently.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Person used to reading code finds math symbols confusing. Wants math symbols replaced by code. Somehow unaware that people who are used to reading math symbols would find code confusing.

In other news, I think French speakers should be made to speak English, because I find French very confusing, and English seems so easily understood by comparison. So we'd actually be helping them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think French speakers should be made to speak English

You're more tolerant than I am. I think French speakers should be executed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In other news, I think French speakers should be made to speak English, because I find French very confusing, and English seems so easily understood by comparison. So we'd actually be helping them.

I agree both with the OP and u

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No you still see standard math notation in computer science papers all the fucking time, this guy's just incredibly autistic

If nothing else, typesetting pseudocode in a paper takes at least a thousand times as long as a_i\in\mathbb{Z}\ \forall\ i\in\{1,2,...,x\}\Rightarrow\exists\ \{b_1,b_2,...,b_x\}\in\mathbb{Z}\ :\ (\prod_{i=1}^{x}a_i\lambda(n)+1)=(\sum_{i=1}^{x}b_i\lambda(n)^i)+1, which is already ugly enough, and god forbid you have to rearrange it at some point

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah like has he never read a paper on ML or recsys or anything tangentially related? They love their notation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

$\sum_{n=1}^{n=4}\left(3n\right)^{4}$

rdrama natively supports LaTeX when?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Using simple math logic symbols makes things so much clear and understandable. The math notation produce so much less clutter and shit than pseudocode.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, but the problem with simple math logic symbols is that you have to do the work. With pseudocode, you just type it in, and the machine does all the work.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't even know how you would show a logical inference in pseudocode either. A implies B is kind of a cornerstone of any math worth writing out :marseyfacepalm: Or do we need to learn a new syntax with different kinds of equal signs that no one will even agree on :marseysigh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

....you mean this?

A | B |A->B


T | T | T

T | F | F

F | T | T

F | F | T


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there are plenty of latex packages for coding that are super easy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And also don't fit any publication's style requirements :marseydoomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if self publishing is enough for flat earthers it’s enough for codecels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you're looking for something easy, you're in the wrong place. Coding is hard work and takes a lot of dedication. If you're not willing to put in the effort, you might as well give up now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

true that’s why i work at F@gman

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why don't you go work at McDonald's if you're so unhappy with your current job?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycapitalistmanlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyseethe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TC or GTFO

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Coding is hard work and takes a lot of dedication

Wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

English speakers will not stop until we colonize all Romance languages

:#marseybongo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Half of Anglo-Saxon gibberish is already french :marseybong:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would like to see how he writes his calculus exam in pseudocode lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I literally did stuff like this. When I was in high school, graphing calculators were fairly new, and we were allowed to use them on tests. Many of the teachers didn't realize or didn't care that you could program all the formulas into them, so that's what all the programmercels did. It's not cheating if you exploit a loophole they didn't ban yet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tbf if you programmed it yourself you probably retained it better than your classmates and learned something like programming which is a win for society too.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LPT i used a ti89 with symbolic diff/integration through hs. OP


:!marseybarrel: :marseybarreldrunk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyspecial:

Function Main
    Output "Hello world!"
End
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

actually we used to define computational logic in math symbols,

but that's a terrible way of writing logic that's understable, so we stopped doing that very quickly.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The :chudsey: "writing logic in code is easier" dramanaut vs the :marseychadthundercock: Kenneth E. Iverson:

Mathematical notation provides perhaps the best-known and best-developed example of language used consciously as a tool of thought. Recognition of the important role of notation in mathematics is clear from the quotations from mathematicians given in Cajori ' s A History of Mathematical Notations [2, pp.332,3313. They are well worth reading in full, but the following excerpts suggest the tone:

By relieving the brain of all unnecessary work, a good notation sets it free to concentrate on more advanced problems, and in effect increases the mental power of the race.

The quantity of meaning compressed into small space by algebraic signs, is another circumstance that facilitates the reasonings we are accustomed to carry on by their aid.

-Charles Babbage

link

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyautism:

tisms say the darndest things literally nobody cares about

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Code monkeys too dumb to understand why DSLs are useful.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

how is that even possible lol ? its in the name. they are good for sucking peepee :marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree, we should make francs speak a real language like English.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No, I do not want to understand what the french say

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/1657820796299844.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I posted my reply here without actually reading the Twitter conversation. And now I have, there's a guy posting this:

This is like an English speaker being mad that a movie is in French.

Why did we both independently pick on French speakers?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.


Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.