Unable to load image

Reason why @idio3 has a nukes

During the summer of 2016, members of President Barack Obama's national-security team secretly staged a war game in which Russia invades a NATO country in the Baltics and then uses a low-yield tactical nuclear weapon against NATO forces to end the conflict on favorable terms. As described by Fred Kaplan in The Bomb (2020), two groups of Obama officials reached widely divergent conclusions about what the United States should do. The National Security Council's so-called Principals Committee—including Cabinet officers and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—decided that the United States had no choice but to retaliate with nuclear weapons. Any other type of response, the committee argued, would show a lack of resolve, damage American credibility, and weaken the NATO alliance. Choosing a suitable nuclear target proved difficult, however. Hitting Russia's invading force would kill innocent civilians in a NATO country. Striking targets inside Russia might escalate the conflict to an all-out nuclear war. In the end, the NSC Principals Committee recommended a nuclear attack on Belarus—a nation that had played no role whatsoever in the invasion of the NATO ally but had the misfortune of being a Russian ally.

Basically the idea if Russia uses nuke on Ukraine Nato as retaliation can nuke Belarus

Here are some response that west can do if Russia uses nukes in Ukraine

>Deliver MIG-29 Soviet era fighter aircraft (currently in the hands of the Poles) to the Ukrainians immediately, as their pilots already fly them very capably. In this scenario, the U.S. would immediately backfill with F-16s to Warsaw

>Consider giving the Ukrainians U.S. F-16 fighter aircraft, particularly some of the early models. These are relatively simple to fly, very lethal in both air-to-air scenarios and in air-to-ground attacks. The U.S. would train a cadre of Ukrainian pilots, probably taking them to Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany

>Increase the supply of advanced surface to air defensive missile systems, probably older Hawk systems but also the modern Patriot (wide area, relatively easy to train to operate) and Iron Dome (developed jointly with Israel, excellent point defense systems to be used around big

>Directly and overtly target the Russian Black Sea fleet and provide Ukraine with the intelligence and long-range cruise missiles to sink a significant number of high value warship's

>Strongly consider a response is the world of cyber, particularly going after Russian military capabilities aggressively.

>Confiscate all Russian financial assets in western hands, around $300 billion, for the express use of reconstructing Ukraine

>Push China, India, and other major “swing voter” nations to condemn Putin and cut off trade with Russia

Yes this is time magazine from 2022 so as you see only Russian using nukes is missing.

That's why I been saying west played all its cards, only direct war with Russia is left in wish they are going to win KDA game

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Factcheck: This claim has been confirmed as correct by experts.


This post was reviewed by an independent team of fact checkers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Side note: it's a function of that testosterone crippled brain that you are so focused on peepees, and your own peepee in particular. Guess what? Take estrogen for a while and you will lose focus on that body part to the point where it doesn't even matter anymore. There is so much more to being a woman that genitals, like the depth and complexity of emotions and bonding with others in ways that are literally incomprehensible to you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.