During the summer of 2016, members of President Barack Obama's national-security team secretly staged a war game in which Russia invades a NATO country in the Baltics and then uses a low-yield tactical nuclear weapon against NATO forces to end the conflict on favorable terms. As described by Fred Kaplan in The Bomb (2020), two groups of Obama officials reached widely divergent conclusions about what the United States should do. The National Security Council's so-called Principals Committee—including Cabinet officers and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—decided that the United States had no choice but to retaliate with nuclear weapons. Any other type of response, the committee argued, would show a lack of resolve, damage American credibility, and weaken the NATO alliance. Choosing a suitable nuclear target proved difficult, however. Hitting Russia's invading force would kill innocent civilians in a NATO country. Striking targets inside Russia might escalate the conflict to an all-out nuclear war. In the end, the NSC Principals Committee recommended a nuclear attack on Belarus—a nation that had played no role whatsoever in the invasion of the NATO ally but had the misfortune of being a Russian ally.
Basically the idea if Russia uses nuke on Ukraine Nato as retaliation can nuke Belarus
Here are some response that west can do if Russia uses nukes in Ukraine
Yes this is time magazine from 2022 so as you see only Russian using nukes is missing.
That's why I been saying west played all its cards, only direct war with Russia is left in wish they are going to win KDA game
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Factcheck: This claim has been confirmed as correct by experts.
This post was reviewed by an independent team of fact checkers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context