Dude look at Polands arms deals alone. They couldn't take on Poland now, forget about the rest of Europe. Also Poland and Estonia bought a ton of coastal batteries and air defense so there couldn't even use there navy or air force.
Putin had pretty much directly threatened Ukraine with war if they tried to enter NATO way before that you fricking r-slurs. Stop parroting whatever slop corporate media feed you
Yeah I mean they've only invaded Georgia, Crimea, Donbas, and then Ukraine proper. Why would anyone think they would go after other former satellite states?
It's as if Russia attacks any former satellite state that tries to enter NATO or something and the American psychopaths knew that which is why they tried to enter Ukraine into NATO
NATOids: "Sure we almost started a nuclear war because the Soviets tried to put nuclear weapons in a sovereign country that was next to us after we tried to put them to Turkey, sure we threatened the Solomon Islands with war just the previous year if they allowed Chinese military bases there but we had NO idea Russia would do this to their neighbor of their most vulnerable border if we started lobbying for an Ukraine NATO membership"
Bellicose-Twinkkill/carp
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Xenu 9mo ago#5935332
spent 0 currency on pings
It's as if Russia attacks any former satellite state that tries to enter NATO
Isn't this entire conflict simply the result of the Euromaidan, which was in turn merely a reaction to Russia exerting diplomatic influence on Ukraine? It's pretty clear the Kremlin has been intent on bringing Kiev under its thumb for over a decade.
the American psychopaths
What makes America any more psychopathic than every other national actor involved? What's so wrong with pursuing their national interests at the expense of foreigners*? Everyone else is doing it.
*I include both the Russians and Ukrainians under this term.
Isn't this entire conflict simply the result of the Euromaidan, which was in turn merely a reaction to Russia exerting diplomatic influence on Ukraine? It's pretty clear the Kremlin has been intent on bringing Kiev under its thumb for over a decade.
It's as if Euromaidan along with Syria's and Libya's "civil wars" were Obama's doctrine of overthrowing governments with a combination of sneaky NGO bullshit and the CIA funding and arming of extremists, in Libya and Syria actual Muslim terrorists that were sending truckloads of weapons to ISIS which is how it became so successful and in Ukraine neonazis, and that what you call Euromaidan was another American coup d'etat of a democratically elected government
Szia_uramhung/aryan
Lois, democracy and liberalism is non-negotiable
Xenu 9mo ago#5934032
Edited 9mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
>See your honour, I only threatened to beat my b-word of a wife up if she called the police on me, it's her fault. (I'd have still beaten up her regardless)
GigaNew2024Accountqu/acc
I upmarsey posts "I downmarsey bad posts" downmarseyd; UNBLOCK ME HAILVICTORY1776
BushWasRight 9mo ago#5934057
spent 0 currency on pings
And there was no invasion! It's a special military operation now, chud
I mean I don't disagree I don't think Putin will invade any NATO country despite his grandstanding and threats, but I do think it is increasingly likely that he will take the next step after funding all the far right and separatist anti EU/NATO fringe parties and just start straight up arming some of them
Yeah, he's never going to stop chipping away and subverting. Putin is he's basically the Jeff Bezos of dictators.
The chance of there being more indirect warfare between Russia and NATO is very high, even after Ukraine is concluded. Maybe that will spill over into a direct conflict as things escalate, but NATO should welcome that more than Russia at this stage.
A lot more dominoes are going to have to tip (mainly the Baltics) for it not to be a suicidal prospect for Russia.
I don't think Putin has very many years left anyway, I feel like this stuff is going to be pretty slow and once he's gone Russia's gonna implode politically
If history is anything to go by, Russia will implode - there will be all kinds of hope for change from the West - and then it will reemerge with another guy who is almost as bad, or worse, than Putin at the helm.
It's definitely not going to get better, but Putin has intentionally made it so there isn't a clear successor- I think the infighting will have some very negative consequences on the country, beyond the political loss of Putin being gone, and even if whoever follows Putin isn't going to be better the country will be at the very least significantly weakened economically and politically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Does anyone outside of Twitter actually believe this?
I know Romney definitely doesn't. It's just something politicians are pretending to believe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Depends if DDR withdraws from Nato, probs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, NATO would have to be weakened significantly from where it even is now for this to make any sense.
And while Putin is a gambler and pretty incompetent, he's actually not Hitler. He's not likely to make any suicidally bad decisions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Dude look at Polands arms deals alone. They couldn't take on Poland now, forget about the rest of Europe. Also Poland and Estonia bought a ton of coastal batteries and air defense so there couldn't even use there navy or air force.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Putin had pretty much directly threatened Ukraine with war if they tried to enter NATO way before that you fricking r-slurs. Stop parroting whatever slop corporate media feed you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah I mean they've only invaded Georgia, Crimea, Donbas, and then Ukraine proper. Why would anyone think they would go after other former satellite states?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's as if Russia attacks any former satellite state that tries to enter NATO or something and the American psychopaths knew that which is why they tried to enter Ukraine into NATO
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
R-slurs: "This is America's fault"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
NATOids: "Sure we almost started a nuclear war because the Soviets tried to put nuclear weapons in a sovereign country that was next to us after we tried to put them to Turkey, sure we threatened the Solomon Islands with war just the previous year if they allowed Chinese military bases there but we had NO idea Russia would do this to their neighbor of their most vulnerable border if we started lobbying for an Ukraine NATO membership"
Insincere fricking cucks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I gave you another example from last year you illiterate r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Isn't this entire conflict simply the result of the Euromaidan, which was in turn merely a reaction to Russia exerting diplomatic influence on Ukraine? It's pretty clear the Kremlin has been intent on bringing Kiev under its thumb for over a decade.
What makes America any more psychopathic than every other national actor involved? What's so wrong with pursuing their national interests at the expense of foreigners*? Everyone else is doing it.
*I include both the Russians and Ukrainians under this term.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's as if Euromaidan along with Syria's and Libya's "civil wars" were Obama's doctrine of overthrowing governments with a combination of sneaky NGO bullshit and the CIA funding and arming of extremists, in Libya and Syria actual Muslim terrorists that were sending truckloads of weapons to ISIS which is how it became so successful and in Ukraine neonazis, and that what you call Euromaidan was another American coup d'etat of a democratically elected government
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Westoid doesn't know how ISIS was actually formed, no surprise there at all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
And there was no invasion! It's a special military operation now, chud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nobody believed this either until this happened.
Also Russia would 100% invade the baltics the second it sensed NATO wouldn't absolutely defend it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Poland and the Baltic have making huge weapons deals. The Russian is to weak to even take them on now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
and r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funny
I mean I don't disagree I don't think Putin will invade any NATO country despite his grandstanding and threats, but I do think it is increasingly likely that he will take the next step after funding all the far right and separatist anti EU/NATO fringe parties and just start straight up arming some of them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, he's never going to stop chipping away and subverting. Putin is he's basically the Jeff Bezos of dictators.
The chance of there being more indirect warfare between Russia and NATO is very high, even after Ukraine is concluded. Maybe that will spill over into a direct conflict as things escalate, but NATO should welcome that more than Russia at this stage.
A lot more dominoes are going to have to tip (mainly the Baltics) for it not to be a suicidal prospect for Russia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't think Putin has very many years left anyway, I feel like this stuff is going to be pretty slow and once he's gone Russia's gonna implode politically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If history is anything to go by, Russia will implode - there will be all kinds of hope for change from the West - and then it will reemerge with another guy who is almost as bad, or worse, than Putin at the helm.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's definitely not going to get better, but Putin has intentionally made it so there isn't a clear successor- I think the infighting will have some very negative consequences on the country, beyond the political loss of Putin being gone, and even if whoever follows Putin isn't going to be better the country will be at the very least significantly weakened economically and politically
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And in the end it will be the wests fault that they elected yet another kleptocrat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I could see Putin doing it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context