.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
https://youtube.com/watch?v=w4VpVtVsSCo&t=1s
Top Poster of the Day:
hohomothyX2
Current Registered Users: 28,757
/h/slavshit SETTINGS /h/slavshit LOG /h/slavshit MODS /h/slavshit EXILEES /h/slavshit FOLLOWERS /h/slavshit BLOCKERS
Current software version: 0c40c50
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because Russians consider Ukraine, Transnistria, and Belarus to be rightfully Russian. That can't be said about any other nation in Europe. Also, he only attacked Ukraine when they tried to join NATO.
Romney is just butthurt that MAGAtards don't wanna fund the UniParty's war. He's an r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Baltics, Poland, Czech Republic, Romania, Yugoslavia, Greece can be attacked with the same justification.
But who are we kidding? If Russia could get away with taking over France, they would just declare might makes right xaxaxaxaxa get fricked. It's all just empty justification to justify being the aggressor, it's a waste of time to even entertain it. In the end Russia would try to conquer and subjugate the local population to the tsar.. sorry oligarchs whoever they can and justify it later.
Zagreb was founded and built by Hungarians, Belgrade from an unremarkable border garrison town that was reduced to ruins due to neglect between the Byzantines and Hungary became a fortress city and center of commerce in the region the under Hungarians between 13th-15th century (same timeframe Putin justified it all). Nobody seriously believes it belongs to us, nor a war of aggression would be justified because of it. Novgorod, Kiev and Moscow was itself founded by swedes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not really, Belarus, Transnistria, and Ukraine have been part of Russia since before the Soviet Union. Their states didn't even exist until after the end of the Cold War.
I mean, if Russia could take over France, they would be the heroes of Europe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So was Poland, the baltics and Finland. But like I said, they don't need justification, they take what they can get away with. What basis did they have to Konigsberg? Nothing changed about them since then.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Poland was an independent state for hundreds of years before the Soviet Union. Finland left Russia after the fall of the Empire and is, like Baltic states culturally distinct from Russia. Also, Belarus, Transnistria, and Ukraine have a significant Russian-speaking and identifying population. Personally, I absolutely think that Estonians have it coming if Russia ever invades them. Banning the Russian language in schools and in official use despite having a considerable Russian population is more than enough reason for Russians to invade them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So you deny big and kind russia would invade anyone else "just this one time bro, trust me", while simultanously already justifying why Russia should invade the baltics lmao.
SerbBIPOCs like this are the exact same breed as russians, both of you deserve another 100 years of toiling under your local chinovniks while even the ottoman r*pebabies get richer than you.
So like Ukraine, until they failed to defend themselves in 1921, unlike the poles who managed to defeat them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm justifying that Russia should invade any country that's hostile to its Russian population. Ukraine and Estonia are currently the only countries that fit that description.
As I said, Trianon didn't go far enough. And the Soviets should have run over way more of you with their tanks. It just proves how kind they are towards you. At least they prevented your country from becoming libtarded.
The Soviet Union is not the Russian Federation, Eastern Eurotards should really stop being r-slurred in that regard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then why use Poland and Finland as an example, all 3 declared independence in 1917, the only reason Ukraine didn't follow the path of Finland and Poland, was that they couldn't defeat the red army, unlike Poland and Finland, then all 3 had to fight their war of independence, often multiple times. Surely this time Russia will act benelovent, trust him and if you don't, you are russophobic so deserve to get invaded anyways
And of course not wanting to be a russian vasal instantly qualifies as such, therefore they can justify it against whomever they want.
Maybe try convince some gullible westoids about how innocent russias intentions are or how misunderstood she is by nazi butthurt belters, nobody with a double digit IQ east of the Oder will believe it anyways, you yourself don't believe it either, you just hope Russia can get away with it so that later you might get away with a little trolling in Kosovo too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ukraine was always a part of Russia. Poland, Finland, and the Baltic states for only about a hundred years. Not enough to call it a historical Russian land, which is why Russia never cared about Finland's and Baltic states' independence as much as Ukrainian. And even then, the parts of Ukraine that Russia currently occupies were not a part of the Ukrainian Republic while it was independent. They were given to them by the Soviet Union. If Ukrainians want to "decommunize" Ukraine, then they should return the territories they got from a communist government.
No, actively repressing your Russian-speaking population qualifies as such. Of which both Ukraine and Estonia are guilty. They both banned pro-Russian parties, Estonia banned the Russian language in an official capacity, and Ukraine committed torture, kidnapping, and mass murder of the Russian-speaking population in Donbas (this was done almost exclusively by the SBU and the volunteer battalions). Are Russians innocent of those crimes? Not really. But Putin's job is to protect the Russian population.
And if Ukraine wants to join NATO (which is the main reason for this war) then they can't be that concerned about killing civilians, or they would never join an organization that intentionally targeted civilian targets and supported a terrorist organization that killed Albanians and non-Albanians indiscriminately.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context