@WeihnachtenSalvador even the Russians now say it's an A-50. 4 months if your coping and you were just proven wrong. Imagine being this r-slurred.
- 29
- 11
@WeihnachtenSalvador even the Russians now say it's an A-50. 4 months if your coping and you were just proven wrong. Imagine being this r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@Aevann can you unban him for this. It's been 4 months of him denying this shoot down so it's kind of big.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
done, just for u
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
CIVILIAN
REGISTRATION
NUMBER
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@WeihnachtenSalvador
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I tried to check the official website
https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/hamovnicheskij didn't found anything about this story. The og story and the verdict was given by Tass(media) there was no mention of A50 or pac-2 or even Trudovaya Armenia so the guy just gave his opinion as fact tho.
So this is wrong in the end.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's a Kommersant article linked in this thread, the closest thing Russia has to WSJ/FT.
Anyway, you don't really speak English, let alone Russian, so what made you think you have the ability to actually research this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/21123335
This is the og story it has no mentions of a50. Kommersant article is opinion article it even has a strange tittle “ Радар налетел на теракт “
You can even see Komersant posted its story 2 hours after Tass story.
You can also see Komersant post has 2 authors when. Tass one has no author
Is not a journ*list but an investigator
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol still coping and seething. You're the only one that can't admit it. Even Russia says you're wrong.
Tell us again about the mobik that "telled you the plane series numbers"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You saying this yet you have no proof.
https://tass.ru/proisshestviya/21118533
So this story with no much info was turned into pac-2 from Dniper shots a50 in Armenian district. A rocked that weight 900kg and around 80kg is warhead, that can fly only 160km. Let's assume without 10% of body weight (warhead) it can fly extra 50km that Armenia district would still be way out of that missile range if it's located in Dniper.
So in the end it's you who is coping since your story today didn't proved anything
Better luck next time
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Huh? According to Ukrainian sources the February shoot-down was done by S-200 (and this is the one this thread is about): https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/02/23/7443442/
Patriot was claimed to be used in January: https://english.nv.ua/nation/a-50-ukraine-destroyed-a-russian-awacs-aircraft-for-the-first-time-with-the-help-of-patriot-50425710.html
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
His source says it's a pac-2 so just a proof his source is not very correct. The og story has no mentions of a50.
But the January story is also strange because Russian jet was supposedly shot 170km from the front line but there is zero chances that Ukraine would put patriot on 0km front line since drones would blown it up. All patriot Ukraine lost were 50km from the front line.
Also those stories told at same time Ukraine told this story:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The post here, which is supposedly the russians saying a-50, says patriot not s-200
so either this post, which you two are fellating each other over, is either wrong one way or wrong the other, but either way it's wrong an dyou should just go on a date with eaach other alreayd
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Who cares about what some random telegram post says, that's why I posted a Kommersant article.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
expecting people to click away from rdrama.net
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Russians say ukranians shot it down. Are you calling Russians liars?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What Russian ? Have you checked the og story and found an a-50 ?
Just one week ago a government representative told no A50 were shot down and today no gov representative told an A50 were shot down.
Like I mention already the og story from investigator has no a50 and it's just some telegram bloggers and etc turned that story into pac-2 shot down an a50.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They put out an arrest warrant for shooting it down. Are you saying Russian courts are lying? You claim it's impossible for the missile to reach. Please help exonerate this innocent ukranian.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There was no mention of a50
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So which is it? They can't hit it or it wasn't an a50? You can't claim both.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
A source that isn't a shitty telegram screenshot: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6773563
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Source: this anonymous wall of poorly-formatted text
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Everyone but sal admits it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Please I'm begging yall stop giving into the bread and circuses while Gaza is going through a US taxpayer funded genocide
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context