https://twitter.com/maks_nafo_fella/status/1816121207831306547
✈️🇺🇦 "Ukraine will not use F-16s on the front line", — Syrskyi
— MAKS 24 🇺🇦👀 (@Maks_NAFO_FELLA) July 24, 2024
👀 Fighter jets will be used to strengthen air defence. F-16s will destroy Russian cruise missiles and strike ground targets, but will remain "40+ km from the front line" due to the risk of being shot down. pic.twitter.com/BleD6uH0Au
By 40km he means 400km tho since Russian ad go beyond 40km
It's Biden fault a small multi role jet with short range and relatively low lift weight is not destroying Moscow !
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pooping your pants and screaming that we can't prove we smell it doesn't make it go away.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I am the guy that claims Russia did something then couldn't prove it and then afraid to bet on my truth ?
Oh wait it's you
There is also good news for you no international organisation opened a case so claiming it was Russian missile is now a dirty speculation
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See above.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But serious question, since you know you can't beat me, why are u still trying to prove me something ?
The figurative speech you used is just a shit. It suggest that if you can't prove it, it doesn't mean it don't exists so you basically tell me to believe in your god without giving proofs he exist outside your beliefs. That's some tribe shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I know you're really low IQ, but I'll make it simpler than the pants pooping analogy:
I post evidence that disputes your claim.
You claim that evidence is faked.
You fail to provide any support to that claim.
You refuse to do so when asked multiple times.
You continue to reply with deflections
You declare yourself the winner but still seeth post in new thread.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So you telling me I should believe you and not international court organisations or even Ukraine that didn't send formal blame to Russia ? I also should believe your AI edited picture without metadata while civil law code says such thing can't be an evidence ?
You calling me low IQ, praising my evade skills and yet don't realise I have formal law discipline?
Wow bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So things only happen if the ICC says they happen?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There are other international organisations but general to your question yes. It also often start with UN demand but Ukraine that day bitched that they are the true successor to Soviet Union not Russia and wanted the nuclear plant back.
In such big events between 2 countries normally only a third party can find a solution. Those 2 countries can search an solution between then but Ukraine cut all relationship between Russia except economical
But as you see Ukraine has more important bizz even that hospital is more concerned with events that happened in January
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You heard it here first, nothing happened prior to 2002, as the ICC did not exist prior.
None of them are that old.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You can prove what you smell, there are olfactory sensor than can pick odor molecules.
That you are an idiot ?
I know
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!r-slurs, would you go through this much effort to prove you didn't shit your pants?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Tell me did I owned you so hard that you had to ping other people to be your backup? You can't have one to one discussion with me ?
You now literally searching for excuses why you can't prove your claims and want that people blindly believe you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Says the user who tried to move the discussion to my wall before I pinged r-slurs. I merely wished to consult the experts in pants pooping.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How is that an argument to
?
Your wall was virgin before I made a comment there so it's pretty lonely place where only you and me were.
You are part of that group
Would that suggest you are pants pooping expert ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's no point in milking lolcow like you without an audience.
For someone who loves to cite court procedures, you must have missed the concept of "Conflict of Interest"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context