Russia didn't invade Ukraine before 2014 because they had so much goodwill between each other.
You see how dumb that is? Do you?
What about the weapon purchases? We use standardized equipment through our NATO agreements. Not because of goodwill. How about Europe's failure to meet their NATO agreements with military spending? Why aren't you complaining about this decades-long lack of goodwill?
Honestly, where did you hear this "goodwill" argument from? Reddit? Some leftoid media on TV? It's really naive.
Now, apply your logic to the pre-2014 situation with Ukraine and Russia.
It's an analogy, sweaty.
You're making a very arbitrary argument by hinging everything on magical goodwill while ignoring all other factors.
If you really care a lot about international relations (IR), then read a basic book on it instead of regurgitating shit from reddit. Foreign Affairs is also a good source on current geopolitical issues.
Bends Knee after NEETBUCKS FREEZE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I like how you were willingly excluding the part about weapon purchases. But by that metric, what part of the alliance did Europe not fulfill?
An integral part of an alliance is threathening your allies with taking over their land.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Russia didn't invade Ukraine before 2014 because they had so much goodwill between each other.
You see how dumb that is? Do you?
What about the weapon purchases? We use standardized equipment through our NATO agreements. Not because of goodwill. How about Europe's failure to meet their NATO agreements with military spending? Why aren't you complaining about this decades-long lack of goodwill?
Honestly, where did you hear this "goodwill" argument from? Reddit? Some leftoid media on TV? It's really naive.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I just don't think that in any way relevant or comperable, you are just unfortunately incredibly r-slurred.
Because of said goodwill, you think it happened in a vacuum? Same with the F-35 and a lot of other systems.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You see your second paragraph?
X is goodwill. Y is an outcome.
Now, apply your logic to the pre-2014 situation with Ukraine and Russia.
It's an analogy, sweaty.
You're making a very arbitrary argument by hinging everything on magical goodwill while ignoring all other factors.
If you really care a lot about international relations (IR), then read a basic book on it instead of regurgitating shit from reddit. Foreign Affairs is also a good source on current geopolitical issues.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context