J.K. Rowling misunderstands female reproductive biology

All women have peepeees.

Even I have a better understanding of female reproductive biology than JK Rowling.

Her definition is almost exactly what they teach in biology class as the definition of female, and more or less what chatGPT or Wikipedia would tell you.

All definitions are fuzzy, though. You can define a chair as something with four legs that is intended for sitting, and someone could break one of the legs and say "well I guess it's not a chair anymore!". There's exceptions to the definition of species as well. In the end all definitions are imperfect at capturing every single case. A good definition maximizes usefulness and minimizes edge cases. Since most men don't see trans women as fungible with biological women, trying to fuse the categories fails the first criteria of maximizing usefulness. A notable exception to this is if you're a gigapassoid. If you're trans and men consider you substantially fungible with biological women, then I'd have no problem saying you're a real woman.

Woman: an organism straight men want to frick.

There's evidence it could be either way

sophistry is not gonna turn you into a woman

You really gotta stretch her words to come to the conclusion that she's wrong. Maybe consider that you're just

Just change "produces" to "produced" and the definition is valid, you spectacularly r-slurred pedant.

Honestly, my personal opinion on JK Rowling is I don't fricking care. She has the right to her beliefs and nothing she says is that fricking offensive. I'm sick of hearing about her, I'm sick of people overreacting to some pretty mundane views, I can disagree with someone's views and still read Harry Potter and play some silly wizard game and still like it. I pirate fricking everything anyway, she isn't getting a fricking dime.

She is getting off on attention and her whole game is people over fricking react and look fricking r-slurred and as a , It affects me because it causes people to act uncomfortable upon meeting me thinking I'm going to scream their head off for the slightest offense. I just want to mind my own business and I'm not interested in whatever fricking gender politics people are focusing on. I want access to Health Care, be free from discrimination in employment and housing and be free from violence or harassment in my day to day life and that is it. Your personal opinions about my gender identity, as long as you respect me somewhat, and I don't even enforce or care about gender pronouns, are whatever, you can believe whatever you want.

It doesn't cause me harm if someone calls me "he" because they have deeply held experiences or beliefs based on religious views, eventually, that is something I've realized I need to accommodate a bit to society and I can't expect society to accommodate perfectly to me. It's just a fricking one syllable word. I'm not saying someone should misgender intentionally to be a peepee, but frick. It's worse if a professor is on edge for example, thinking I'm going to be sensitive at the tiniest little mistake. I have to talk to every professor on the first day of class after class and tell them straight up "Don't believe I'm sensitive or anything." I do put forth effort, but I'm never going to pass, that is the reality. I have a deep voice, people accidentally misgender me without realizing. It's fricking okay.

I'm not saying I agree with JK Rowling or her views, but the best way to handle her is to just fricking ignore her and let her fade into obscurity.

Her fanbase also known as TERFs is composed of people who should view walking up a set of stairs as more threatening than a transgender person. They're loud, but they don't fricking go outside that often, and they're just going to grow the more attention you give her. s and TERFs also have something in common, none of them are breeding.

>She seems to be under the impression that women produce eggs over the course of their lifetime

She said they belong to the s*x class that produces large gametes.

Which s*x class produces large gametes?

Yes, a knows more than a !biofoids. You owned JK Rowling on this one fact SLAY AF

>TERF is r-slurred

its easier to say she cant produce viable eggs than to say she doesnt have any eggs

She means "produce" as in "provide for use" not "make new ones". Hope this helps clarify

This sounds like /r/menwritingwomen and /r/badwomensanatomy all rolled into one

Females are not capable of making new eggs

What fricking r-slur wrote this

For that to be true we'd still have to be working off of the original supply God embedded into Eve

Or I guess maybe they think each child's fresh supply comes from the father somehow

She wrote so many words instead of just saying xx=woman

That bathtub hrt is making you r-slurred OP

A person claiming to be a woman makes circular arguments: Valid

A person who claims to be a woman yet wants to stick to facts and logic: CLOCKED!

What if a woman is born without ovaries? Patients with vaginal agenesis who also have androgen insensitivity syndrome do not have ovaries. But they appear as normal women.

I demand she correct her definition at once. I don't give a shit about s or culture wars or whatever, I demand she do it to satisfy my medical autism.

Also her definition is circular as frick

Rich, coming from the demographic that defines woman as someone who identifies as a woman

Smartest TERF

Tbh, you don't have to care about what people think, even if you like their books.

Even weirder, you can disagree with someone and still like them or their work.

You're never going to get her to change her mind, no matter how many studies you post or how much you show her your reasoning.

So why get mad or care?

@QuakerOats @Frank_Williams don't be so mean to JK Rowling, how was she supposed to know?

I look forward to impending train derailment.

shit bait from an r-slured BIPOC @I_am_a_man_sweety keep yourself safe immediement

hi starry, im very much a live and let live kind of person, so i generally dont like just assuming that people are being facetious. one thing im confused about though is that you have self-referred multiple times using male terminology. "boyclit", "boislut", and "bussy" to name a few. me personally, referring to myself with any male terms tends like that to make me dysphoric. do you mind clarifying exactly how you feel about this kind of terminology? is it like, "okay i can say it but others cant"? or maybe you're not a transwoman, but more something along the lines of enby or genderfluid? or are you a femboy on hrt? im very confused and would like some clarification, but recognize im not entitled to answers. i would just like to be in an environment where everybody is on the same page. thats all :)

Foids have all their eggs from birth which means women still made their eggs through meiosis at one point.

Also her definition is circular as frick

>everyone who belongs to the s*x class is in the s*x class

yes in fact the purpose of a definition is to define the word you're defining