emoji-award-marseytranscope
Unable to load image
Reported by:

J.K. Rowling misunderstands female reproductive biology

https://i.rdrama.net/images/171244336158849.webp

She seems to be under the impression that women produce eggs over the course of their lifetime

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17124433619335225.webp

Also her definition is circular as frick

>everyone who belongs to the s*x class is in the s*x class

:#picard:

52
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All women have peepeees.

Even I have a better understanding of female reproductive biology than JK Rowling.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A clitoris is just a micropeepee

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Women be small peepeeed 🤣

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i'm pretty sure that pre-natally speaking this is actually kind of true

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aren't we all just a clump of cells? So the cops should really be more chill about DUIs and vehicular homicide.

(If I deconstruct things enough, even I don't know what the frick I'm talking about. :marseyfluffy:)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes, but a human being either is alive or not. And humans in general care about the human, not clumps of cells

>If I deconstruct things enough, even I don't know what the frick I'm talking about. :marseyfluffy:

this is actually a thing post-structuralists could be okay with (not postmodernists though, they can have standards). This is 30 yrs old: https://www.fudco.com/chip/deconstr.html have fun

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I believe that you're referring to omegas

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We've kind of colonized their gender.

We are US, and people with vaginas are the Native Americans. It's the way things go. They should grow a peepee if they want to be woman and adapt to our culture.

:marseysaluteusa:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Obviously the end point is stage 8, what stage we at right now sis

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17124569557817085.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17124440974777288.webp

There's evidence it could be either way

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sophistry is not gonna turn you into a woman

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • Bix : :marseyjamming: JUMP! I walked into the coffee shop :marseyjamming:

Long term estrogen usage already did that :marseynails:

Also it isn't sophistry to assert I'm a woman when everyone I know, family, friends, strangers i meet, government officials, etc. effortlessly affirms this. The sophistry is when you say everything that does not meet criteria X is not a woman and then also carve out a bunch of exceptions based on vibes (but im totally not defining a woman based on vibes!)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally adult human female

:chadb#lackyes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes chad poster is r-slurred as usual

All this does is shift the argument to what is a female, which is functionally the same question

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Large gamete maker.

:chadblack#yes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even though there are women who don't make any gametes at all

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They can go to the freakshow or loony bin with the rest of you tbh

:marsey#garfield:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I accept your concession

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You really gotta stretch her words to come to the conclusion that she's wrong. Maybe consider that you're just :marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean, her own post is a hedge against her own wrongness. If she actually believed the absence or presence of large gamete production was sufficient to determine whether or not someone was a woman she woild just say that. She has to ammend her statement as "belongs to the s*x class who produces large gametes" because she knows there are women who have no large gametes and never had large gametes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like you're doing that thing where you suck at actually reading words again.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're being obtuse because I'm right :marseyindignantwoman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How many people would you say misalign with her definition if she leaves out the "class" part of her statement? 0.01%?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It doesn't matter. Either something is a necessary component of a category or it isn't

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This isn't debate or philosophy class, dipshit. Answer the question or I'll frick you up with some Gödel.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can push the definitions any which way but you're really more man than woman. The answer is just being comfortable with being an inbetween which for some reason :!marseytrain:s refuse to do despite that being the superior option.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Endocrinology can overrule every other sexual trait except chromosomes so i'd argue it should be the primary basis on which someone's biology can be said to be closer to male or female

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Won't help those linebacker shoulders or Adam's Apple tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It will if you get on HRT early enough to avoid the development of either (or if you're #blessed with a feminine body relative to your age)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're not a woman but it's ok.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Is this autism or jewish chadry?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just change "produces" to "produced" and the definition is valid, you spectacularly r-slurred pedant. :#marseygigaretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No joke. Women just do all their meiosis on the front end. They still take their moms X and their dad's X and recombine them into large, nutrient-laden gametes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Women are lazy as frick

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>She seems to be under the impression that women produce eggs over the course of their lifetime

She said they belong to the s*x class that produces large gametes.

Which s*x class produces large gametes?

:marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MEN CAN MENSTRUATE TOO

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>TERF is r-slurred

:#marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

its easier to say she cant produce viable eggs than to say she doesnt have any eggs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She means "produce" as in "provide for use" not "make new ones". Hope this helps clarify :marseysuffragette:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This sounds like /r/menwritingwomen and /r/badwomensanatomy all rolled into one

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Females are not capable of making new eggs

What fricking r-slur wrote this

For that to be true we'd still have to be working off of the original supply God embedded into Eve

Or I guess maybe they think each child's fresh supply comes from the father somehow

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The fresh supply is developed by the child in the womb :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What's your point? Are you saying the child isn't female in the womb?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im saying the eggs are only created after the introduction of sperm

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok and?

The wiki says it doesn't happen at all, as if the author takes "assigned female at birth" literally or something

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Eggs are created as the woman is created. Technically your grandma carried half of you in her womb.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She wrote so many words instead of just saying xx=woman

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They keep moving the goalposts, they draw a line in the sand and then have to draw a new one when it repeatedly gets pointed out that eg. there are cis XY women and cis XX men

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there are cis XY women and cis XX men

There arent tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In some lucky XY individuals, their SRY gene is mutated or deleted so it no longer works, and they end up developing as female, sparing them the cursed existence of a male :marseysuffragette:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That bathtub hrt is making you r-slurred OP

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A person claiming to be a woman makes circular arguments: Valid

A person who claims to be a woman yet wants to stick to facts and logic: CLOCKED!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhorseshoe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What if a woman is born without ovaries? Patients with vaginal agenesis who also have androgen insensitivity syndrome do not have ovaries. But they appear as normal women.

I demand she correct her definition at once. I don't give a shit about :!marseytrain:s or culture wars or whatever, I demand she do it to satisfy my medical autism.

:marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What if a woman is born without arms?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also her definition is circular as frick

Rich, coming from the demographic that defines woman as someone who identifies as a woman

:marseyspecial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Quoting Vaush: "That's not a circular definition. Why? Because it refers to the archetype."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Quoting Vaush

:marseydisagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Im not a theyfab albeit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Smartest TERF

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tbh, you don't have to care about what people think, even if you like their books.

Even weirder, you can disagree with someone and still like them or their work.

You're never going to get her to change her mind, no matter how many studies you post or how much you show her your reasoning.

So why get mad or care?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@QuakerOats @Frank_Williams don't be so mean to JK Rowling, how was she supposed to know? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foids have all their eggs from birth which means women still made their eggs through meiosis at one point.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also her definition is circular as frick

>everyone who belongs to the s*x class is in the s*x class

yes in fact the purpose of a definition is to define the word you're defining

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.