https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckddgw0p8xvo
A transgender woman has been found guilty of r*pe following a night out.
Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.
Swindon Crown Court was told Secker would be tried as a woman and she was found guilty of one count of r*pe on Friday, following a four day trial.
She was remanded in custody and is due to be sentenced on 27 September.
Det Con Corrina Wiltshire, from Wiltshire Police, said: "I would firstly like to thank our victim in this case who has been inspirational in the way they have handled things."
She said the case had taken a long time to come before a judge and commended the victim for their commitment to getting justice, "despite the hurdles".
"They have such incredible strength and I hope it shows others that they can do this too," she added.
The thing that never happens happened again... for the millionth time. 
Also, apparently, r*pe is something that only men can be convicted of under English law. So, if this man is being tried "as a woman", then he's not being tried for r*pe.
The BBC is a disgrace.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It requires a peepee.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And a vagina. Assrape isn't real r*pe in bongistan
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Huh?
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/r*pe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
At common law it was sodomy and not r*pe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Buggery
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I can think of numerous ways that a woman could r*pe someone - with an object, for example.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He mentioned English law, in which r*pe is a specific offense and requires use of a peepee. A broomhandle would be Assault by Penetration, a separate offense.
The only way a woman can be charged with r*pe in the UK is if she has a dong or is being charged as an accomplice to someone who has a dong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh, you were referring to how English law on r*pe requires a peepee - yes, that's correct. Anything else is assault by penetration. In this particular case, the male feminist didn't
out early enough to avoid being convicted of r*pe. If he had started crossdressing BEFORE he r*ped her, then he could have gotten off with only paying a few hundred pounds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sounds like it's the peepee and not the pronouns that has to do with the charge
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So, basically no one did shit and she had to do everything herself. What happened to bongs? They used to rule the world, and now they're getting cucked by
peepees.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's like this everywhere. If you get r*ped and want to see the perp held to account, you have to subject yourself to an invasive and uncomfortable r*pe test at a hospital, and then go to court where you have to tell the entire story to a group of strangers while your male feminist stares at you and his lawyer asks you questions and aggressively tries to paint you as a liar.
All this for something that doesnt even guarantee a conviction since in many cases the evidence is he said/she said
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's also fricked up how they just ignore most r*pe kits. Some cities have backlogs going back to the 1980s with thousands of kits never tested. I remember reading about one city that got federal cash to clear their backlog, and they found nearly 1000 male feminists whose DNA was already in the federal database. Crime labs are so underfunded thanks to these shitty politicians and poor budgeting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It would be so fricking funny if trains caused Bongs to change their laws so that women can commit r*pe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
King you should put these in /h/chudrama
This is a trans safe space ( Factcheck all of rDrama is)
I think
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
/h/transgender is THE premier place to post about
s!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
We truly have the best transgenders, don't we, folks? Cute, valid
s. People tell me, Trump, there's no way rdrama has the best 
s. They're wrong, folks. Lying CNN, oh boy, let me tell you. Lying CNN will tell you rdrama doesn't have the best 
s. They LIE. They LIE about me, they lie about you, they lie about our 
s. CNN. I see you in the back there. Oh yes, I see you. You know I'm talking about you. The most beautiful 
s. We've got em right here folks. The best. Truly the best. When I got that bad guy. Very bad guy let me tell you: Al Baghdadi. I know, I know boooo. Wah wah wah. D , E , A , DEAD. Died like a dog. Like a dog, and not one of our incredible military dogs. Titanium teeth. Have I told you this? The generals don't want me to tell you, but the dogs. Beautiful dogs. They've got titanium teeth. Better teeth than even I've got. How about that? Al Salami. He died like a dog. Anyways folks, Al Pajami said rdrama doesn't have the best 
s. Guess what? I killed him. Killed him dead. Ding dong dead, folks. Anyways he sounded like lying CNN in the back, folks, right? Best 
s. Big, beautiful transexuals. We've got them. Cheating Joe might think he has them, but oh no. I'll say it again, folks. The biggest, cutest, most valid 
s. Right here on rdrama.
Snapshots:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckddgw0p8xvo:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What the heck did they do?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context