Hitler made a coalition with another party to achieve supermajority so a superminority is moot. The point of it all is that Hitler's rise to power is worse than what people think. He was Lawful Evil and achieved power through arguably legitimate means, which is a warning to all democracies that their systems are vulnerable to internet memes.

Also he never tried to overthrow the Weimar Republic. He tried to overthrow a Bavarian triumvirate cabal who was trying to overthrow the Weimar Republic. They were a bunch of Bavarian dudes who wanted to install a fascist dictatorship and also blamed the Jews for losing WW1.

And even though I rip of Europeans, TBH the US constitutional amendment system is both gay and not gay.

It's not gay, in that the original 13 colonies formed a union having been created by different entities and different times for different reasons, so they made constitutional amendments require a 3/4 state local electorate vote rather than basing it off national population vote because some states started off more populous than others.

It's also super gay because it's 200+ years later and we treat all new states that we have created as if the starting conditions were the same, and one party controls a majority of all the states which are incredibly low-population.

According to the constitution, in the event of an electoral tie, the math works out that the party who controls the most state legislatures, regardless of size, picks the president.

My argument isn't that Hitler was based or deserved to lead an indistrialized nation.

My argument is that if your democracy is fragile enough to be overthrown by internet frog memes, it deserves to be and should.