BREAKING: Dr. Erin Reed PhD has published her fact check of the latest New York Times trans hit piece

Reminder to everyone that lost track: this guy is one of the that steals clothes but not the bald one.

I never even got the logic of why doctors don't give testosterone to adult men who want to improve their lives, but they're willing to give kids puberty blockers.

Many studies have come out about transgender people in recent weeks. One study, for In recent weeks, several studies have emerged focusing on transgender individuals. One study in the prestigious journal Nature Human Behavior, for example,

The opening paragraph.

Lol. Lmao even.

You scared me there that reed actually had a PhD this whole time.

>Claim: Joana Olson-Kennedy is withholding research from the Trans Youth Care because of a charged American political environment over transgender people.

>Fact: Twenty-eight studies have been published from the Trans Youth Care (TYC) Network study, including from patients on puberty blockers.

Note how the "fact" here is not an actual denial of the "claim".

Which is how I read this entire post - it doesn't attack the core fact of the NYT article, which appears to be that a study is being placed in the file drawer because it might be used in bad faith by chuds.

Worse, it implies that this is a good thing because the sample size was small. None of this matters in a preregistered study unless you actually messed up the design, like you didn't realize that your sample was too small to really test your hypotheses. But this is not being argued, so presumably this isn't the case.

The implicit argument that I've seen from leftoids is that is you have 49 pro-X studies and 1 anti-X study, then it's okay to spike the anti-X study since it was probably flawed or underpowered and if you publish it then the anti-X chuds will latch onto it and dismiss the 49 other studies and thus you will end up with worse outcomes. Even if it's Bad Science, the scientific method needs to bend towards the realities of modern-day politics and discourse and the fact that people (assuming we consider chuds to be people) cannot be trusted to process evidence correctly. It's not completely indefensible, but leftoids aren't quite willing to say this quiet part out loud yet and so you end up with irrelevant distractions and hand-waving like you see in this article.

hi starry, im very much a live and let live kind of person, so i generally dont like just assuming that people are being facetious. one thing im confused about though is that you have self-referred multiple times using male terminology. "boyclit", "boislut", and "bussy" to name a few. me personally, referring to myself with any male terms tends like that to make me dysphoric. do you mind clarifying exactly how you feel about this kind of terminology? is it like, "okay i can say it but others cant"? or maybe you're not a transwoman, but more something along the lines of enby or genderfluid? or are you a femboy on hrt? im very confused and would like some clarification, but recognize im not entitled to answers. i would just like to be in an environment where everybody is on the same page. thats all :)

Snapshots:

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/fact-check-new-york-times-publishes:

• ghostarchive.org

• archive.org

• archive.ph (click to archive)