Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is a misleading title. It is the judge's job to ask the lawyer questions to make sure their ultimate ruling is in line with precedent. She's not necessarily arguing in favor that the discrimination is the same, she's asking him to tell her why it isn't the same. That's her job.

What the judge actually said:

"So that's like the supreme court saying there, if you have a law that says white applications only - this is a biological woman entrance only - it seems to me that this is quite parallel, you can't have a sign that says white people only can come into this restaurant"

She's straight-up arguing that the discrimination is the same, there's no questions there

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>her job

To :#marseymerchantfoid: you out of your rights lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>your rights

it's the foids birthright to fleece the paypig population (m*les) out of every last penny. Some women made a very heavy sacrifice to birth him, if he's economically productive, it's payback time

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

reperations for the female community

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

LET'S FRICKING GOOOOO AHHHH RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT!!!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean, it's fine to raise the question but I would ask why gender discrimination in general is considered legal then - why can't cis men go to these spas? "Punching up" is not going to stand up to any sort of legal scrutiny and gender is a protected class as well. Presumably the same rationales for discrimination apply to trans women.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.