Unable to load image

Subnautica fans on a roller coaster right now

One of the best games of the last decade (with one of the more disappointing sequels of this decade) got its sequel half-announced yesterday, with the publisher stating it will be a "multiplayer-focused live-service game." Holy yikes, for a game that had an expansion-turned-offshoot that sucked in part due to it removing the sense of being alone exploring an alien world, this is awful news, right? Twitter and the game's subreddit agree, because that's the correct take.

A lot of g*mer seethe here, but by and large can be summed up by this pic

https://i.imgur.com/Y84KRWF.png

Subreddit wasn't have much fun either. I think they deleted a lot of the posts after the devs Corrected the Record™️, so a little hard to find threads but there's still a few up. There is a little coping, too, but it seems most people are unsurprised that the devs continue to misunderstand why their game was good in the first place.

Shout out to this based chad setting coping subnutters right.

Developer: We're making our next game use a shitty model that prioritizes money over fun and engaging content.

Sane people: We're not going to buy your game

Other people: Come on guys, just because every other GAAS game is terrible doesn't mean that this one will be.

Major "communism will work THIS time" vibes.

Finally, the devs speak out and clarify that nooo child, the game will not have a battlepass, it will simply have updates over time :^). They even go as far as to comment and lock threads that were pooping on the publisher statement.

Correct take from random dude (option 1 is probably most correct, with a bit of option 2).

No one has ever used that definition of GaaS until now. GaaS as a term comes from SaaS, which is built entirely around recurring revenue and subscriptions. Why would they use that to represent just doing typical patches and updates if there weren't ideas for recurring revenue? There are three possibilities in my mind:

1 The investor relations team used GaaS because it's popular right now and makes investors happy, but they aren't actually implementing any GaaS aspects

2 The playerbase is being duped

3 They were planning to go GaaS and aren't now because we all freaked out

Sadly, it seems most people take this to assume everything is copacetic and in fact we should all pretend Below Zero wasn't one of the most bland games of 2021, as seen in the [quote tweets of the IGN correction post.] (https://x.com/IGN/status/1755674941830152302/retweets/with_comments)

Not really that dramatic after the fact, but I guess it's nice the game got announced, sort of.

95
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It ends with some emotionally manipulative guitar twang music, you're just the g*mer version of those people who feel super emotional when a crappy tv show ends with a rising emotional score and the characters looking back meaningfully at each other

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, I liked the game quite a bit, but my least favorite part was the ending. The puzzle solving and figuring out clues along the way was much more interesting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

found the incel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyxd:

I almost want to beat it just so I can be a better hater. Just that art style :vomit: Seemed like reddit incarnate.

It's got newtonian physics :!soyjackwow: so to be fair you need a high IQ to enjoy it :bigsmilesoyjak: and the story is probably some nonsense about mysterious aliens creating a time loop set up in the first 30 minutes (idk didn't finish or care to look it up) but don't look it up or you'll ruin it :soyjakhipster:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.