Also I'm getting really bussy-blasted and pissed about /r/baldursgate newstrags telling oldgaurd that the original games has always been shit, and that Larian has saved you backwards barbarians from yourselves

https://old.reddit.com/r/baldursgate/comments/1annt4s/possible_hot_take_about_a_certain_third

"Now that the smoke has cleared on Baldur's Gate 3, I think we can move from the honeymoon phase to the realistic conversation phase. I love bg3, I've loved it since early access, so I'm not an oldhead mad that times change. But I don't think BG3 should be called BG3, I don't think it's similar enough in spirit or mechanically to be a successor. A great cRPG, yeah, a fun dnd game, of course, but for a game that says it's the 3rd Baldur's Gate, it's not even the halfway close to resembling it. I find myself wishing that BG3 had been done by Owlcat because BG1 and 2 have more similarities to the Pathfinder games than BG3."

Basically my shit take and opinion

frick this guy in particular

"What you're saying is 20 years out of date. The lack of real-time-with-pause isn't enough to say it's not ‘Baldur's Gate.' The world has moved on from this outdated gameplay style. Then why the frick are you on this sub if you despise the system then

"I love the original Bg games and I always will but sitting here complaining that it wasn't the old style seems like you just kinda wanna whine about it" that's not fricking true, there are such intense differences in gameplay, and RTP seems to be universally despised by turn-based chodes so there is merit to the complaints

pettiness and misattributing OP, love me some /r/baldursgate straggotry