Pretty much everything coming out for "Project Caesar" (It's EU5, everyone knows it's EU5, just call it fricking EU5 you fricking Swedes) except the meme year start date (Byzantium should not be a viable country in an early modern period game, those schizos died in the middle ages let them stay dead frick byzaboos) and the ugly 3d model they keep forcing in every game since CK3 to justify having an in-house 3d modeling department sounds too good to be true, the newest dev diary literally has them talking about playable "army based countries", which I assume is paving the way for playable mercenary company DLC, that sounds fun as heck especially in multiplayer.
Feel free to PM me a link to this thread and laugh at me for being an r-slur when this game comes out in two years and ends up being a Victoria 3 tier trash fire.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
God I hope it's good. I have thousands of hours in EU4. I don't have a ton of faith though. Paradox hasn't done great things with their more recent games, and I could see them fricking up EU.
They shouldn't change the major mechanics. Leave trade, diplomacy etc. alone and tweak it. I could see an argument for changing developing provinces though since that is boring
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context