Pretty much everything coming out for "Project Caesar" (It's EU5, everyone knows it's EU5, just call it fricking EU5 you fricking Swedes) except the meme year start date (Byzantium should not be a viable country in an early modern period game, those schizos died in the middle ages let them stay dead frick byzaboos) and the ugly 3d model they keep forcing in every game since CK3 to justify having an in-house 3d modeling department sounds too good to be true, the newest dev diary literally has them talking about playable "army based countries", which I assume is paving the way for playable mercenary company DLC, that sounds fun as heck especially in multiplayer.
Feel free to PM me a link to this thread and laugh at me for being an r-slur when this game comes out in two years and ends up being a Victoria 3 tier trash fire.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
By the way, is Imperator Rome worth playing now? I keep thinking about it since I only played like two thirds of a run at launch
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just play Old World, it's a much better game
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
redditors insist yes every time subject is brought up.
Personally I disagree, just reading through trade mechanics makes me wonder why didn't they just copy EU4 its way better than that.
Albeit I may be biased here as I'm not a big classicalcel and find other periods more interesting in general.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I thought everybody, especially Paradox, forgot about Imperator Rome
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context