Unable to load image

Bait idea: Pro s*x bots sub

The bait is simple: There seems to be a lot of science regarding how s*x bots are bad and essentially replacing women with technology. Feminists have actually suggested banning them preemptively before they even hit market. There doesn't appear to be any substantial subs regarding pro-s*x bots. The sub would be brigaded by women non-stop and I don't believe this sub idea breaks any rules at all. We could also make s*x bots using stable diffusion. I know there's a lot of android pictures out there. We could find prompts to make them and then modify them to get our s*x bot waifus. It would cause immeasurable seethe since it's incel related too but not actually against the rules.

https://old.reddit.com/r/sexbots

>This subreddit was banned due to being unmoderated.

Can some janny grab this?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-era-of-digisexuality-is-here-thanks-to-screens-teledildonics-and-romantic-bots

>digisexual

also a good sub name

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3235704/S*x-robots-BANNED-Experts-call-crackdown-unnecessary-undesirable-technology.html

>S*x robots should be BANNED: Expert calls for crackdown on 'unnecessary and undesirable' technology

https://old.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/8gjxyt/even_sex_bots_have_standards/?sort=controversial

They hate this shit existing

edit added picture example, I can make tons of these that look like celebs or something lol

![](/images/16637172155002422.webp)

70
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16637172579600706.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Robot :tayclap: s*x :marseyclapping: is :marseyklenny: real :clap: s*x :marseyclappingglasses:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make it an incel sub. Make sure to ban all explicit misogyny, but have threads about how much you prefer your bot over a woman. Have curious guys come through wondering if they should replace their gfs with sexbots. They would post a bunch of complains (she gets mad at me if I don't clean, etc) about their gf that feminists can't refute, which would make them sneed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make sure to ban all explicit misogyny, but have threads about how much you prefer your bot over a woman

This is key it will piss off incels AND women

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When should I show up to mock everyone for not touching grass and finding the marefriend of their dreams? Buncha useless urbancels.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unless you mean virtual marefriends (in which case based), we probably shouldn't have explicit support for beastiality.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cyberponies.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Once the feminists get bored and we pick a bunch of unfunny incel posters, then we switch to shilling furry sexbots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyexcitedexosuit:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16506556593095329.webp)

I absolutely adore that idea but please at least be fricking competent at it for once.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Has anyone posted this in starterpacks yet?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the one case the name would actually fit

/r/LoveForRobots :marseysob:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Robosexual would be another good sub name.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/robosexual is taken, so I created /r/robotsexual. Go crazy. PM me if you want mod.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

globorobo

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think there would be more support than outrage considering the current state of Reddit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kinda the point

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

SHEX?!?!?:marseyflushzoom:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#horny:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like a delicate op. If your intentions are to epically own the feminists I'm beyond skeptical of your ability to pull it off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It'll just turn into another of the thousands of coomer subs. Or most likely die after 2 days when dramatard get tired of the new toy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

#DropTheFoid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

S*x bots will eliminate s*x work and the exploitation of womxn!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This could be a fun angle to bait :marseyoctopus2: with. S*x negative :marseydisagree: feminism :marseyhandmaid: always make :marseyyarn: redditors :marseyhammersrdine: fume.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The s*x bot picture you posted does not appear to have a vagina.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You can obviously switch out vaginas on the fly it's adaptable lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>pro s*x work

NO NOT THAT KIND

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/r/sciencebots once the originals get banned. I’m the vibe or braincels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Women 3.0

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If sexbots ever become real they'd first become majorly popular in the furry communitycult I think.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk there's probably an existing sexbot sub about dildos

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mr Fisto from fallout approves

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also high seethe potential for having "unrealistic" proportioned s*x bots

  • anime faces

  • gargantuan tits

  • tiny waists

  • lolis

  • etc

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i think this is too basic to attract a lot of attention without some kind of twist. there are already subs for s*x dolls & "robosexuals," they don't really get brigaded often.

i think you're a little too optimistic about this but i do like the concept. it's just going to need to be 100x more inflammatory to get the attention of the people you want to show up

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can't think of a single way to incorporate Andrew Tate

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There could be some kind of humanoid robot of him, and people could bust huge loads in it

EDIT: with lifelike bussy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

hey can you give /u/SneedingOrangeCat88 mod permissions?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.