From: A History of Education in Antiquity by HI Marrow
The cat so fast he's a streak 
1yr ago
(image post)
1,265 thread views
#114874
The Ancients could count 
to 1,000,000 on their fingers 
- 78
- 106
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 25,701
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 3d41b79
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I once met these ethiopian children who looked like ghosts - they counted on the segments of their fingers, pointing with their thumb. They used base 12 for some reason and it was really spooky and cool.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Base 12 is some ancient mesopotamian thing iirc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Also due to the (((12 tribes))) of Yesrael.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those were just allegories for the 12 zodiac signs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Factcheck: You really believe that shit? Lmao dumbass neighbor π€£
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Probably convergent evolution because it's such a good base number. Decimal is kind if r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's actually an ancient Babylonian way of counting.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
also the reason time is base 12
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funny enough people jerk off the metric system as being so much superior to imperial, but the metric system was created during the French Revolution. Creating a new series of standardized measurements being in itself a revolutionary act. They also attempted to apply metric principles to time, but that didn't catch on the same way, because the ancient system of time telling is simply better and more intuitive
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you are a proponent of burgers switching completely to metric but donβt also support universal decimal time, youβre a hypocritical coward.
There is no argument for a metric US that doesnβt equally apply to decimal time aside from βbut everyone else uses itβ, and yet no one argues for decimal time because no one actually cares about the metric system, just dunking on burgers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
India should be first to convert to metric time because there would be a lakh seconds in a day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Currychads be counting their fat stacks of cash and I can't even tell a lakh from a crore.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A lakh is a hundred thousand. A crore is a hundred lakh. Why currycels insist on a mixture of hundreds and thousands for large numbers is quite beyond me, but a couple of random facts more to memorise isn't stupidly hard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Metric time isn't for time of day, you mean decimal time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Time is already metricized for seconds and below. What people don't want to metricize is dates and schedules, which is slighly unfortunate given the many inconsistencies of our calendar system but overall understandable since it would mean a social upheaval far beyond a switch of the units on street signs or rulers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Very importantly, it allowed for standardized military equipment. You didn't need carpenters to painstakingly mould limbers to your artillery, you could get tighter fits on your cannonballs and musketballs, easily move divisions between corps. Very useful in case, say, all of your neighbors decide to fight you at the same time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good point, but standardization was the main factor there. A standardized imperial system would have accomplished the same goals but during that time they wanted to get rid of any imperial or aristocratic notions so they started from scratch. But the way a meter is defined is essentially just as arbitrary as the way a foot is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ackshually a foot is defined as a particular number of meters so that's definitely more arbitrary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
before the meter was invented the length of a foot (unit) was defined as "the length of an average foot", and each city had their own reference foot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats why Im saying the standardization is the important part, not the metric itself. Besides that it was always close to our foot anyway across most cultures. The Greek pous (foot) that was used to measure length during the building of temples and such was very close in length to out modern day foot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What a load of crap. The metric system is the only logical system of measurement and is used by the vast majority of the world. Your backwards-butt system is an anachronism and needs to die.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you've worked construction, you quickly find that Imperial measurements are intuitively better for guesstimation. I live in a metric country, but scaffolders still use the imperial system when left to themselves. Over the last decade we've had management increasingly make tube sizes be cut to metric measurements, probably to make it easier on the Engineerchads and for pricing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yea I fully agree, think about height. Is it easier to describe a man's height in feet and inches or hundreds of centimeters? I believe tailors also prefer imperial
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Americans measure a manβs weight in hundreds of pounds just fine, even though itβs easier to describe a personβs weight in Stones, which is analogous to using Feet to measure height. Besides, metric folks are as likely to say β1.8 metresβ as β180 centimetresβ to describe their height. Itβs not really about ease as much as what youβre used to.
Britain is a weird place for Metric/Imperial. We still use feet and inches for a personβs height, stones for a personβs weight. We use miles and mph, not kph. Weights in the gym are kilos, and measures on a building site are metric (even though the workers mostly think in feet and inches). Milk and beer are sold in pints, but the measure on the carton or bottle is in mls or cls.
We basically use imperial for most day-to-day things except cooking, where itβs all metric because Americaβs volume-based measures are obscenely r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
there's no difference in difficulty. 5'11'' or 1.80m
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
One is fractions the other is decimal. It just makes way more sense to express height in imperial units. Also temperature imperial has a huge advantage
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
A "second" is intuitive to humans because it's approximately the duration of 1 resting heart beat.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unless you're a fatty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Metric isnβt useful for anything but conversions anyway, and those almost never matter at all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The metric system is unironically superior and only an r-slur would think imperial is somehow better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's better for some things and worse for others. The main benefit is standardization across different fields/industries but if we used a standardized imperial system that goal would also be accomplished
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How would a standardised imperial system work in physics, construction, medicine etc?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you think that people didn't build, study physics, or practice medicine before they invented metric out of thin air? I mean construction in the US is all done in imperial as far as I know. Most of the great monuments in world history were built using pre standard imperial
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Well, that's because there are 24 hours in a day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
QED
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Thats because we define a day as a 24hr period. If hours were defined differently days would be as well. In the metric system days are 10 hours long
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That doesn't make sense.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Most intellectual dramatard.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The hours are 2.4 times longer
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Base 12 is so cool
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Base 12 is better if you use fractions rather than decimals.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fractions are generally superior and more intuitive than decimals
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Fractions are more used on a smallscale level. You can break things down in halves, thirds quarters and sixes with base twelve. Base 10 is has halves and fifths. Decimals come up rarely for dividing fields, chopping wood, building small buildings, etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I met a bunch of Somalians and they mostly use their long spindly fingers to open bags of trash for sustenance
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
12 finger sections
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context