For context, this landlord is paying the tenants electricity bill and wants to keep the thermostat at 66 degrees (19 in non burger units) and redditors think he's freezing then to death lmao
Sneeding:
"Guys making my house a fricking kiln at someone elses expense is literally a human right"
Over your cold dead body lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The most reasonable solution to this disagreement would be to reduce the portion of the rent that was allocated for the heating bill, and give the tenant the responsibility/freedom to pay the bill instead.
Physically locking the thermostat in a cuck box is passive aggressive r-sluration, and will result in the tenant either bypassing/destroying the box, or moving out (or endlessly bitching online because they're too kitty to communicate with their landlord).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're probably in a big building with with central heating and there's no way to meter how much individual unit uses. Locking the thermostats is the fair solution because otherwise you get some jerk off setting it to 85 and running up the bill for everyone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If that's the case, then they're obviously a hustlebustlecel and deserve everything they get.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The tenants who live in these units are, more often than not, unable to handle that freedom. And then your overpriced $150k/door apartment complex catches fire in a tragic amphetamine production accident
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context