Perfect, no notes, I am simply in awe pic.twitter.com/iDS7f39GiJ
— Π‘Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΠ°Π½ΡΠ»ΡΠ² (@ManoolsAreCool) January 30, 2023
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1620155196721758209
Ukrainian will lose because they don't know how to paint properly
https://x.com/OnlyDans123/status/1620163575074652160
Being able to paint tanks is a WEF conspiracy
https://x.com/GiggaMAGA/status/1620200083643043841
Some unrelated seething
https://x.com/lebaneseogre/status/1620416010577940482
https://x.com/DutchMichel/status/1620358198028038145
https://x.com/SociologPetrHam/status/1620324559798013953
His final to try and save face
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1620175187957391360
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1620180317561831434
He also seems to be an Iran simp who thinks everything in the middle east is mossad
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1620346747729104896
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1598483990486327298
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1594321653177065472
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context