When Americans Lost Faith in the News | The New Yorker

they realized that faith != sales

reminder that "alt media" is still media btw

i don't trust media not i trust you op. good article

No one trusts state media bc it solely serves the interests of the oligarchs, and it’s super obvious, even some liberals can see it. Drunpf defending himself against these propagandist isn’t what ruined their credibility, perhaps even a tiny bit of introspection would help. They literally pushed qanon level Russia conspiracies for two years, shits wild.

Maybe the reason people hate j*unos is because they write shit like this

I feel like the fact that if I caned the author of the recent Kiwifarms piece once for every lie in the article, his butt would turn into minced meat by the time I finished, might have something to do with it

Journo hacks never talk about the death of correspondence, smarter-than-thou journoshits failing to realise that they know literally nothing about anything except journ*lism and just assuming they didn't need to source information anymore for some reason.

They haven't a fricking clue, that's why no one listens to them.

If they want people’s faith, I don’t understand why they just won’t try lying less.

As our resident glowie apologist, I'd like to address the bitching and moaning about the CIA.

Revelations about the C.I.A.’s covert involvement in what were ostensibly non-governmental organizations began in 1966

Money to subsidize American college kids going to international student events, art exhibitions, etc. passed through the CIA. They didn't tell anyone what to say or do. Obviously the communists were paying their kids to go to these events and telling them exactly what to say and do. Like all the other shocking revelations of the 1960s, this was something the president had ordered them to do.

gave credentials to C.I.A. agents to use as cover in foreign countries

"CIA agents" every fricking time.

allowed reporters to be debriefed by C.I.A. officials

The horror. CIA interviews certain Americans returning from abroad and asks if they had any information they'd like to share. Does anybody think that Britain, France, Sweden, etc. doesn't do this? Why would this even be controversial? You want to see something dirty, look at how France set up MSF in the 1960s to smuggle weapons into Nigeria for them.

The Times seemed to feel that the issue was whether journ*lists who were involved with the C.I.A. wrote propaganda... [they didn't at all but I'm still butthurt]

What the frick would the issue be with journ*lists other than the risk of them getting subverted to write propaganda? This f-slur doesn't want to tell you the real reason why they forced the CIA to stop talking to journos. It was so that the journos could operate in communist countries without being harassed by their security services. It was all about making their lives easier and more comfortable.

Then he goes on to say that the hippies rioting at the Democratic National Convention in 1968 would have been really popular if the media was just more biased in their favor.

Rightoids, when you believe all the shit you hear about how horrible the glowies were in the 1950s-1960s, remember who made it up. You're on the side of the communists, the queers with gonorrhea, the long-haired freaks, the potheads, the Grateful Dead fans.

>76% of people distrust the media

>52% actually voted

It was the rethuglicans guys

>It is hard to be “objective” and sell news at the same time.

Straight from the horse's mouth.

If tRump lost the popular vote against Hillary and Biden, then why do Americans distrust j*urnos 🤮 at levels higher than Biden voters?

Didn't even mention G*mergate . This journ*list clearly didn't do his research.

This was a pretty funny read after just finishing this deep dive into how journ*lists manufactured the “Russian collusion” narrative over the years since 2016:

https://www.cjr.org/special_report/trumped-up-press-versus-president-part-1.php

Reading that, then seeing this guys take on how it’s everyone’s fault but journ*lists that no one trust them:

It's funny that he would jump to trump because he's one president too late.

Obama broke the media. They were so thrilled to have a smooth talking basketball as president, they decided he could do no wrong. Remember when they went to bat for him on the claim that he had a scandal free presidency? Completely absurd. They destroyed their own credibility during those eight years making the clear decision to abandon objectivity and become state propaganda. Orange man simply called them on it.

Journ*lists do have an agenda. Obviously, now more than ever. And, just as obviously, that agenda makes them untrustworthy.

Who needs objective truth when you're on the right side of history?

As much as we (appropriately) shit on ourselves about Rightoid agendaposting this sort of post is a legitimately good take. rDrama occasionally attracts some smart people. You don't have to be a rightoid to see through these paper thin retroactive excuses pushed by the media.

Imagine congress trying to justify their perpetual 10% rating? You can be sure it would be packed full of 10yr child level excuses like this one.

It takes some arabs to hit NYC in order for people to respect the most basic politician in America. But when the journo's uncritically protects their bullshit (and the bullshit fed via federal agencies) like it's their own children it's oh-so-surprising when people start questioning the value of NYT/WaPo/New Yorker/Time/The Atlantic/etc to be the "defenders of democracy".

Jfc bro literally made it two sentences before he decided it was the orange man who destroyed the journos' credibility.