However much you hate journalists it isnβt enough pic.twitter.com/pTQmR8fSQm
— MISINFOSCIENCE (@MISINFOSCIENCE) February 4, 2023
Context
Basically a black 14 year old kang chimped out on a 9 year old mayo monkey. The journoid reported on the story but the image they used didn't really depict the situation correctly, so vanilla gorillas started coping.
Picture used in the article:
They then found the journ*list and that set them off even more:
So they went to her twitter to sneed at her. But her account is literally just retweeting chinese mobile games so this was the only tweet where they could seethe at her at directly:
Why unnecessary? When you're fat like her it's because you have no self control. Fk that fatty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In some jurisdictions it is verbotten to doxx underaged alledged misbehaving boys. Using top getty image is a safe bet. Chuds stay mad.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
did this little chud get his bag yet?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He settled with CNN and WP for millions. Pretty sure heβs still going after others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No he did not lol. He at most got maybe 50k.
Pretty much every relevant lawyer in the country that specializes in cases like this were mocking rightoids on twitter for thinking he got anywhere near "millions."
The judge dismissed like 20/22 claims.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I also recently heard from every relevant lawyer that Elon was going to lose billions in his recent Civil trial.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's neat, I can go find it if you want and prove you an r-slur.
You seriously think a case in which almost every claim was dismissed settled for millions?
What happened is the payout was cheaper than fighting it in court.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, go prove it, cute twink. When you get back, make sure you provide evidence for new claims while ignoring the old ones.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You missed the point. Your citation of "relevant lawyers" means nothing. That's why I specifically brought them up and addressed just that point, sperg. You know exactly as much about how much money that kid got as anyone else in here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
every relevant lawyer = one lawyer on twitter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wrong again. Such is life as a pizzashill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Im at a friendβs bday party rn with a relevant lawyer and she says youβre r-slurred.
This morning, Cum went to the park. I went with Coom. And Cum brought Coomer frisbee. At least I think it was Coomers. By the end of the day, Cum started throwing the frisbee to Cumself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Wrong
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Proof? They settled pretty quickly for undisclosed amounts, could have been nuisance payments.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally google sandmann cnn settlement please and thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok, I did, still most likely he got about 50k.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You couldn't be more wrong pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
ok cool lmk if you need anything
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More than what you make in a year
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The top five results all say the amount is unknown but other lawcels think its a nuisance fee
Marsey'd for making me google something while being wrong about it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You think you're gonna get accurate information on politically charged topics on a frickin Google search bro? Use your head a little
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ah yes, every time you can't prove a claim (frequent occurrence) you'll claim the truth is being suppressed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Don't forget that kid who put "violent" anti-CNN memes on his Twitter account.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lmao that little cute twink
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sorry your balloon got shot down, pizza.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Frick that kid. Look at his face.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
No getty images for a black kid beating the shit out of a white kid even though it's the overwhelmingly more likely event in real life.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Um, source? Le FBI table doesn't show stats for children playing rough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Based on my experience in elementary school, black kids and white kids administer beatings fairly equally. I was also an equal-opportunity beater
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
it isn't even roughhousing until knives are involved
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
you don't need to make stock photos if real life provided the images already
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The actual author of the article also probably does not choose the accompanying image, which makes the rage extra r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Florida is pretty strict on what can even be mentioned of minors unless it hits a certain level of public knowledge. Even then most jo*rnoids writing about minors in Florida donβt release more than general areas or race. Chuds are just idiots that donβt know what theyβre talking about
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context