Unable to load image

Following Shell, yet another energy giant BP reports record profits. You know the drill :marseysnoo::soyreddit::seethejak::soycry:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/10vxyhg/bp_sees_biggest_profit_in_114year_history_after?sort=controversial

Other seethe posts

https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/10vvq05/bp_profits_double_to_record_23bn/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/10vw5l9/energy_giant_bp_sees_record_profits_of_28bn/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/10vvt4u/energy_giant_bp_sees_record_profits_of_28bn/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/10vvqxn/bbc_news_energy_giant_bps_profits_double_to_28bn/?sort=controversial


BP sees biggest profit in 114-year history after oil and gas prices soar

Energy giant BP has reported record annual profits as it scaled back plans to reduce the amount of oil and gas it produces by 2030.

The company's profits more than doubled to $27.7bn (£23bn) in 2022, as energy prices soared after Russia invaded Ukraine.

Other energy firms have seen similar rises, with Shell reporting record earnings of nearly $40bn last week.

It has led to calls for energy firms to pay more tax as people's bills soar.

BP boss Bernard Looney said the British company was "helping provide the energy the world needs" while investing the transition to green energy.

But it came as the firm scaled back plans to cut carbon emissions by reducing its oil and gas output.

The company - which was one of the first oil and gas giants to announce an ambition to cut emissions to net zero by 2050 - had previously promised that emissions would be 35-40% lower by the end of this decade.

However, on Tuesday it said it was now targeting a 20-30% cut, saying it needed to keep investing in oil and gas to meet current demands.

Climate campaign group Greenpeace, whose voice the BBC has included because of the impact of oil and gas production on the environment, said BP's new strategy "seems to have been strongly undermined by pressure from investors and governments to make even more dirty money out of oil and gas".

Energy prices had begun to climb following the end of Covid lockdowns but rose sharply in March last year after Russia invaded Ukraine, sparking concerns about global supplies.

The price of Brent crude oil reached nearly $128 a barrel, but has since fallen back to about $80. Gas prices also spiked but have come down from their highs.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1684135681871217.webp

It has led to bumper profits for energy companies, but also fuelled a rise in energy bills for households and businesses.

Last year, the government introduced a windfall tax - called the Energy Profits Levy - on the "extraordinary" profits being made at energy companies.

The rate was originally set at 25%, but has now been increased to 35%, and only applies to profits made from extracting UK oil and gas. Oil and gas firms also pay 30% corporation tax on their profits as well as a supplementary 10% rate, taking their total tax rate to 75%.

However, they can reduce the amount of tax they pay by factoring in losses or spending on things like decommissioning North Sea oil platforms.

BP said its UK business, which accounts for less than 10% of its global profits, will pay $2.2bn in tax for 2022, including $700m due to the Energy Profits Levy.

'Windfalls of war'

Andrew Griffith, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, who the BBC spoke to for the government's position, said the windfall tax struck the "right balance" between helping families with the cost of living and securing the UK's energy supplies. He said its aim was to encourage re-investment of the sector's profits back into the economy

Nick Butler, previously a senior executive at BP and now a visiting professor at Kings College, who the BBC spoke to because of his industry experience, said oil and gas prices would not remain "exceptionally high" forever.

"This is a temporary situation. Oil and gas prices are going down and the windfall these companies are making won't last."

In a year that BP boss Bernard Looney described the company as a cash machine, it is little wonder that progressive think tank IPPR called these profits scandalous as millions struggled to pay bills.

The company paid £1.8bn in UK tax - a big increase on a previous estimate - as extra windfall levies pushed the overall tax rate on UK profits to 75%.

Labour said the taxes should be still higher and better incentivise investment in renewables. Perhaps most controversially, BP announced it would miss its targets to reduce oil and gas production by 2030 as it said it would match investment in lower carbon projects with new investment in fossil fuels and extend the life of existing oil and gas projects.

While shareholders may be making the least noise today, their voice is arguably the loudest when BP's competitors like Shell and Exxon are also making record profits.

Labour and the Liberal Democrats, who we've included to explain the opposition's point of view, said the profits were outrageous and called on the government to increase the windfall tax.

The government has had to step in to limit household energy bills, with the average home now paying £2,500 a year, although this is still more than double what it was a year ago.

The cap on bills will also rise to £3,000 from April, although analysts expect households to pay less than that due to a recent drop in gas prices.

As well as announcing record profits, BP increased its payout to shareholders by 10%.

BP's results follow similarly strong profits announced by rivals Shell, Exxon Mobil and Chevron last week.

82
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Redditors struggle to understand supply-and-demand [Difficulty: Impossible]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More like Redditors ignore the difference between profit and profit margin. There's maybe a half dozen comments mentioning profit margins in all those threads combined. No wonder these losers have no idea how to invest. :marseystocksdown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

obviously they are not breaking laws and have done very smart accounting to make off with this much money, knowing that doesn't make me want to fedpost about them any less

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What smart accounting? BP's break-even price for petroleum is about $35/barrel. When crude shot past $120/barrel in 2022, that's pure profit for them.

Labour and Redditors are acting like supply-and-demand is unfair and that any money beyond some arbitrary "fair" cutoff needs to be taxed away.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what :marseypregunta: is your problem with this?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't have a problem with it. I'm just saying there is no "smart accounting" needed to "make off" with a profit when it costs $35 to make something that you can sell for $120.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Also crying everytime someone wants to invest in fossile fuel, because that would be morally wrong as well. They are just idiots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Go back to Reddit r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>differing opinions dont belong here

shut up strag, this is a centrist space

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not a differing opinions it's just r-slurred. THATS why it should be here.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Investing is for cucks, it's all priced in baby

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

suppry and deman? :marseyjewoftheorient:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neither does anyone here when it threatens their chuddery. California is expensive because lots of people want to live there, and no amount of cope changes that.

Even if bad policies have made CA expensive, people put up with it because there's demand.

:#marseycope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My favorite part r Reddit idiocy like this is that none of them will even just buy oil stocks. Like neighbor if it’s a free money cheat or whatever why aren’t you smart enough to get in on it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

even with my natural reaction being to shit on whatever reddit is complaining about I really can't justify all the oil giants making this much by raising my bills clearly massively more than they need to

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oil giants don't really set their prices, it's more like a bidding war (caused by lack of Russian oil) tbh

Not saying it's not fricked but it's less of a "frick those greedy oil giants" and more of a "the way buying/selling oil works is fricked"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oil giants can influence prices somewhat by how much they produce. OPEC+ does this. The ones in the US don't have nearly has much market control since they don't collude like OPEC does. They could produce less and that might drive prices up some. But as far as I know all the refineries in the US have been operating at or close to max capacity for years now.

They could make new refineries. But that's a 10 year/$10 billion dollar investment. And they don't see that as a safe investment when congressional whims can change every 2 years. Democrats being so fiercely anti oil is big factor in those decisions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even if they wanted to go nuts during this boom cycle their investors are sick of it. 2020 was a gut punch and for the first time oil majors showed some restraint. On top of that, you have Biden calling them evil so they aren’t exactly going to bail him out.

To have been better prepared for the war, the majors would have had to spend way more capex in 2021 then anyone wanted them too. No one was calling for huge investments besides oil field trash. They had just lost their butt in 2020 and just wanted a slow ramp up back to normal conditions. Then there is the whole political environment. I am not a “I did that” guy but Biden played a role in it.

Beyond all that, the supply chain took a long time to catch up. Forklifts are still a year out from factories, drill pipe is 12 months or so, frac sands cost are higher than ever. Opec gave the college try to ramp up production and missed their quota month after month.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

2020 :marseypajeet: was a gut punch :marseykino: and for the first :marseywinner: time :marseyprincesszelda2: oil majors showed some restraint.

:#marseyretard3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How so? Oil majors didn’t exactly go wild in 2021 despite crude trending up. They were perfectly happy letting it drift up to around the 80s and slowly invest.

Pre-2015 and especially 2020, they would have spent like neighbor with a record deal. They are getting back there but even that a lot of that spending is on losers hydrogen, recycling plastics and carbon capture.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Noooo you MUST be a heckin contrarian! Don't you know reddit is ALWAYS wrong?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>more than they need to

:#marseyeyeroll2:

Go back.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

do you not understand supply and demand? prices are determined by two sided auctions. trade happens when the highest bidder offers a price that the lowest seller can accept.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nobody has ever understood supply and demand. The markets should work the way [your ideology] demanda

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysneed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I charge my employer massively more than I need to, but like everyone, I like money. Why should oil giants sell their product to your utility company for $X when someone else is willing to pay them $X+1?.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's what's so insidious about reddit. They're so repulsive that they make you vote against your own interests just to spite them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BP is paying me next week so I'm fine with it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Two stroke crotch rocket Chads stay zoomin :marseyjfk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Remember what they took from you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

as extra windfall levies pushed the overall tax rate on UK profits to 75%.

BP said its UK business, which accounts for less than 10% of its global profits, will pay $2.2bn in tax for 2022 (on 2.7 bil)

I'm actually seething so hard rn.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's smart of government to do this. They impose costs on everyone by banning Russian oil imports, and then they also grab the beneficiaries' extra revenue while they're at it. All in the name of somehow making things better for everyone.

It's such a cash grab, and dumb voters cheer it on. :marseylaugh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:derpwhy: Why aren't energy companies investing in moon shots after my government has shown itself to be willing to tax "windfalls?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16757812026281352.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybiden2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>you know the drill

Apparently @1998Presents doesn't

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

![](/images/16757829287157493.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wow so much for free market capitalism

:#marseyseethe:

Thanks, Biden

:#boomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You know the drill

:#marseysting:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

this is kinda more for bong-cels than "le redditor doesn't understand supply and demand"

there is genuine concern with energy companies driving profits, especially since the government is subsidising 35 million into BP this year alone

the expose below is actually quite interesting, because in the North of England (may allah forgive them), vulnerable families and individuals are at risk, with enforcement agents bending the rules on what legally counts as vulnerable

erm i mean, dude bussy seethe and freeze

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseypaintretard:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Should've capped energy prices instead of letting them float up while taxing that extra windfall. It's funny seeing people cheer for an organization which chose the 'inferior' policy in order to extract more tax revenue. When will the r-slurs update their expectations?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i just want to be blessed enough to do an anglo version of:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyw:

Love that Ruski! :marseyembrace:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseywomanmoment:

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/10vvq05/bp_profits_double_to_record_23bn/?sort=controversial:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/10vw5l9/energy_giant_bp_sees_record_profits_of_28bn/?sort=controversial:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/10vvt4u/energy_giant_bp_sees_record_profits_of_28bn/?sort=controversial:

https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/10vvqxn/bbc_news_energy_giant_bps_profits_double_to_28bn/?sort=controversial:

BP sees biggest profit in 114-year history after oil and gas prices soar:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841295480380616.webp:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Rdrama rightoids simp for multibillion dollar fossil fuel company to own le libs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It’s funny that these same people never had a problem with big tech making money off the pandemic, but “war profits” is a bridge too far lol. Especially considering they aren’t in a war

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Make sure to tell everyone itt thanks for supporting dems in eliminating all domestic oil production!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.