@ElverGalarga's comment on 'Tinder Foid Asks Totally Normal Question and Redditors Respond Reasonably And Coherently And Totally Don’t Hit Their Normal Talking Points'

Tinder Foid Asks Totally Normal Question and Redditors Respond Reasonably And Coherently And Totally Don’t Hit Their Normal Talking Points

https://old.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/11qjjpa/alright_thats_enough_tinder_for_me_today

I love the “military unfortunately” comment. I did the same thing and am at the same place. Can’t yet say if it gets any better

https://old.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/11qjjpa/alright_thats_enough_tinder_for_me_today/jc4a5y5/

:#marseysoylentgrin:

Ha! I say the heckin same thing, the military sucks man! I was a water purification tech and my experience is lame and certainly universal! Please

like me fellow “progressive” mayo middle class people.

I gotta disagree I don’t like that he down played himself. You gotta try and be proud of the time you served as every service member should. It’s no easy task! (-84)

https://old.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/11qjjpa/alright_thats_enough_tinder_for_me_today/jc4zpbf/

Gross. Eat boot kiddo

At worst it fricked you over and took your best years and health with it. Or you killed other people.

At best it was an easy laid back jobs program.

No glory either way. Just take what you got from it and move on

https://old.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments/11qjjpa/alright_thats_enough_tinder_for_me_today/jc573d9/

:#ethottalking:

Eat boot?

Those poor fricking innocent Taliban, murderers.

:#marseythonk:

Yep war is bad but aiming your anger over that at people respecting vets isn't the right way, you should be angry at the people sending them there at the expense of taxes for the sake of pissing contests.

:#marseycalm:

No, I’ve worked in military & space & defense industry. It’s all a massive farce that just transfers money from taxpayers to rich businessmen and also lazy butt “service members” that either work their butt off and provide little of value to society, or flaunt lazily around a base or other installation.

It’s complete manufactured consent to even start at a place of “respecting service members” when they’re either jobs program beneficiaries or mercenaries. Last time freedom was defended was decades ago.

Oh you misunderstood, I worked for Raytheon—frick the troops!

It’s a massive farce! Manufactured consent! Bad faith!

Service members were either mercenaries or jobs program beneficiaries!

I don’t have to respect anything ever except what I’m told to, I’m a free thinker!

A redditoid saying someone produces little value to society?

I’m from a base/defense town and I’ve worked in the defense industry. I know what I know. And I’ve had plenty of vets and family members tell me what’s what

Yeah I heard from some people, clearly my experience is as good as someone who spent 20 years in the military!

I seriously fricking hate redditoids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUS CHAD/STUD THE TIGER OF TELAVIV :marseytiger:

1yr ago #3795481

Sometimes suicide seems preferable to coexisting with these creatures

96 Context

9 style/grace :marseyfluffy:

IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUS 1yr ago #3795545

they feel the same way

58 Context

ElverGalarga El/Rey 9 1yr ago #3795566

How do we get Redditoid numbers up?

Ban Replika?

46 Context

aqouta left/right About to lose half his shit lmao ElverGalarga 1yr ago #3795588

Teach reasoning skills.

:#marseytwerking:

25 Context

CrackerStraggot BI/POC boomermonster

aqouta 1yr ago #3796411 Edited 1yr ago

Low-IQ soydregs getting a whiff of concepts that they don't have the processing power to handle is how we got here to begin with. Look at what they've done with Karl Popper for example.

It's like donating pottys to Indians, they won't connect them to plumbing and in a week it'll be a vase filled with shit.

Tldr: Redditors should know their place and be put to work in salt mines. Don't try to civilise them.

9 Context

ElverGalarga El/Rey CrackerStraggot 1yr ago #3800319

https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfrick/comments/uc8p0p/the_true_paradox_of_intolerance/

(I went down the rabbit hole on this one)

A comic attempts to explain what Popper really said.

First reply:

No. Just no. Karl Popper said:

“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.

Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”

― Karl Raimund Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies

So the intolerably intolerant is who incites to intolerance and persecution already. If you incite your followers to go against "the homos" or defame women seeking abortion as baby killers you are intolerably intolerant.

The boot kicking the gay flag towards a pile of religions and BLM is such a weird misrepresentation of Karl Poppers ideas I don't even know where to start.

Check profile of this highly upmarseyd coomenter.

Thread:

Why is no one talking about the 2600 email leak that proves a dedicated plan from republicans, to, in their own words, "eliminate" all transgender people?

which email leak? can someone spoil me with a link?

Ah.

Responds to this moron:

And, given that C.S. Lewis was a radical homophobic Christian himself...

:#marseyitsallsotiresome:

that's oversimplified. somewhat true and somewhat oversimplified

cslewis is considered a closeted gay man who was misguided into celibate, self oppressing lack of sexual fulfilment, for misguided religious reasons. a child of his time he couldn't otherwise, didn't dare otherwise and met the wrong zealously pious people who convinced him his sexuality was "evil".

refs a bit like some Roman cardinal's biography. can't see what mustn't be.

https://medium.com/belover/c-s-lewis-a-queer-history-c3056782ff44

What? Fricking brainworms

This whole thread is a goldmine of sneed

https://old.reddit.com/r/asktransgender/comments/11rcbc7/why_is_no_one_talking_about_the_2600_email_leak/

C. S. Lewis on Homosexuality & Disgust In the first excerpt, taken from Surprised by Joy , Lewis describes his reticence to talk about sins he hasn’t struggled with himself, and then comments on the way that disgust with homosexuality often proceeds from motives that are neither Christian nor ethical.

C. S. Lewis to Sheldon Vanauken on Homosexuality The second excerpt is taken from a letter from C. S. Lewis to Sheldon Vanauken, which Vanauken published in A Severe Mercy . In addition to reiterating the view that homosexual acts are sinful, Lewis asks what the “positive life” of homosexual persons might be, and insists that “every disability conceals a vocation, if only we can find it, which will ‘turn the necessity to glorious gain.’”

C.S. Lewis was not gay. Although his personal life was very private, he did not marry until later in life. It is rumored that he had several relationships with women, including one of his friend's mothers.

:#chadnordic:

möglicherweise ist die vom Vermieter erhoffte Mieterhöhung illegal wegen Mietpreisbremse:

https://www.dgb.de/themen/++co++0d9a5f98-e8bf-11e8-aa5f-52540088cada

falls die da wirkt wo Du wohnst ist es denkbar den Vertrag zu unterschreiben und dann die Miethöhe anzufechten und das auch glatt und sauber durchzusetzen. Das solltest Du jedoch mit einem echten Mietrechtler durchgehen, nicht nur mit der Kanzlei /r/LegaladviceGerman.