Congress foid asks testifying whistleblower about his chud! twitter account. But he says it's not his account :marseybrainlet::marseyxd:

https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1659200213729554435

Do you think she'll fire the zoomer intern who thought it was his account?

Only reddit post I could find. Only 10 comments right now

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/13l21h2/rep_linda_sanchez_dca_asks_fbi_whistleblower/

But maybe someone can help this coomer in /r/Congress

Who is this cute staffer in the FBI Whistleblower meeting next to Sanchez?

99
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If people actually watched congressional hearings no House rep would ever be re-elected.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everything they say is just trying to get sound bites for their twitter and youtube to please the base.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even then 90% of the time it's something completely r-slurred like this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The TikTok hearing was funny af. All the congressboomers were seething at the chinaman CEO who is obviously a puppet.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Isnt he a :marseysingapore:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysingapore::marseysoon::marseyxi:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why does she have purple highlights this b-word is like 60

:#marseyxd::#marseyxd::#marseyxd::#marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's an ally, chud.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseychonkernoticeme:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Iโ€™m seeing this more and more with woke middle aged white women.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseywomanmoment2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyakshually: she was smart, she did this purposefully to get the guy to agree to a statement he never said or wrote.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could he answer that he hasn't formed an opinion on that subject?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How many people could possibly have the name Marcus Allen??

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Like I said in another comment, 10,000 at least. I arrived at this number through science.

But you gotta have more than just a name to bring something up in a hearing like this. Match something else. Dates, locations, pictures, anything more before you accuse someone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong. @bidenthebussyslayer's tweets are tantamount to presidential edicts.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Both are relatively common first and last names so pretty high I would guess

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol maybe we need /s on rdrama too :marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

idk everyone here is r-slurred so I will believe that anyone is saying things fr fr n shit on here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is true

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Twitter needs some sort of verification system so you can know if an account is real.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!r-slurs might enjoy this.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hate women so much it's unreal.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I guess her office just used the twatter search bar for his real name and assumed there are no other Marcus Allens out there or that a whistleblower might choose something, you know...not real?

In other news: Raiders legend Marcus Allen is a Jan 6 guy? Interesting!

https://twitter.com/LindaSanch31399/status/1659209798016184320?s=20

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

firstly: i have a normal life and i wouldn't ever admit to owning my chud burner, incredible hubris to believe people "tell the whole truth" on the stand

secondly: i hate politicians and lawyers that repeat the same question whilst stuttering despite the fact its no longer legally relevant to the line of question, die fishing-cels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure but it wasn't a burner, it was his name. It's just 10,000 other people could have that name.

A real master baiter plan: change your twitter account name to someone who's gonna be testifying. Then feed it to the interns and staffers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i already assume the deep state (people i think are looking at me) are doing this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysnoo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Excuse me. It is MY time right now and I will use it to put words in your mouth!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She probably knew it was bullshit.

Gets people talking about this, and not about the real story.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

B word, they ain't that smart.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The people who do all their work for them are probably pretty smart.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait, I haven't been paying attention to this, so I'm a bit late.

So the FBI claimed that they didn't have anyone working undercover at the jan 6 rally and now there's this testimony that they actually did have assets in place?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the FBI head skirted around the question. He didn't say yes or no explicitly because "risk to sources" or whatever.

I'm sure there were undercover officers. They've got plain clothes at basically any major political gathering. Especially when dealing with wingcucks in DC.

Then we repeatedly see (Michigan governor plot) they've got informants everywhere.

But chuds are coping hard by trying to pin the entire event on Ray Epps and whoever else they claim.

Leftoids do the same thing whenever antifa or blm chimp out.

:#marseyhorseshoe:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah tbh I'd be shocked if they didn't have any undercover assets at jan 6

then again, I'm also shocked they let them into the capitol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I couldnโ€™t watch the whole video because her voice and tone are so hard to listen to without wanting to turn off my phone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.