https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1659200213729554435
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
— The Columbia Bugle ๐บ๐ธ (@ColumbiaBugle) May 18, 2023
Democrat On Weaponization Committee Tries To Expose FBI Whistleblower By Bringing Up His Twitter Activity
Problem: It's Not His Twitter Account pic.twitter.com/f5hJDf6wQH
Do you think she'll fire the zoomer intern who thought it was his account?
Only reddit post I could find. Only 10 comments right now
But maybe someone can help this coomer in /r/Congress
Who is this cute staffer in the FBI Whistleblower meeting next to Sanchez?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If people actually watched congressional hearings no House rep would ever be re-elected.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Everything they say is just trying to get sound bites for their twitter and youtube to please the base.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even then 90% of the time it's something completely r-slurred like this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The TikTok hearing was funny af. All the congressboomers were seething at the chinaman CEO who is obviously a puppet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isnt he a
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why does she have purple highlights this b-word is like 60
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
She's an ally, chud.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Iโm seeing this more and more with woke middle aged white women.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Could he answer that he hasn't formed an opinion on that subject?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
How many people could possibly have the name Marcus Allen??
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like I said in another comment, 10,000 at least. I arrived at this number through science.
But you gotta have more than just a name to bring something up in a hearing like this. Match something else. Dates, locations, pictures, anything more before you accuse someone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wrong. @bidenthebussyslayer's tweets are tantamount to presidential edicts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Both are relatively common first and last names so pretty high I would guess
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lol maybe we need /s on rdrama too
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
idk everyone here is r-slurred so I will believe that anyone is saying things fr fr n shit on here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is true
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm so happy in the CongoShill 1yr ago #4178512 spent 0 currency on pingsTwitter needs some sort of verification system so you can know if an account is real.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!r-slurs might enjoy this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I hate women so much it's unreal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
https://old.reddit.com/r/AskThe_Donald/comments/13l21h2/rep_linda_sanchez_dca_asks_fbi_whistleblower/:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
/r/Congress:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Who is this cute staffer in the FBI Whistleblower meeting next to Sanchez?:
undelete.pullpush.io
archive.org
ghostarchive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I guess her office just used the twatter search bar for his real name and assumed there are no other Marcus Allens out there or that a whistleblower might choose something, you know...not real?
In other news: Raiders legend Marcus Allen is a Jan 6 guy? Interesting!
https://twitter.com/LindaSanch31399/status/1659209798016184320?s=20
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
firstly: i have a normal life and i wouldn't ever admit to owning my chud burner, incredible hubris to believe people "tell the whole truth" on the stand
secondly: i hate politicians and lawyers that repeat the same question whilst stuttering despite the fact its no longer legally relevant to the line of question, die fishing-cels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sure but it wasn't a burner, it was his name. It's just 10,000 other people could have that name.
A real master baiter plan: change your twitter account name to someone who's gonna be testifying. Then feed it to the interns and staffers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i already assume the deep state (people i think are looking at me) are doing this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Excuse me. It is MY time right now and I will use it to put words in your mouth!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
She probably knew it was bullshit.
Gets people talking about this, and not about the real story.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
B word, they ain't that smart.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The people who do all their work for them are probably pretty smart.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wait, I haven't been paying attention to this, so I'm a bit late.
So the FBI claimed that they didn't have anyone working undercover at the jan 6 rally and now there's this testimony that they actually did have assets in place?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think the FBI head skirted around the question. He didn't say yes or no explicitly because "risk to sources" or whatever.
I'm sure there were undercover officers. They've got plain clothes at basically any major political gathering. Especially when dealing with wingcucks in DC.
Then we repeatedly see (Michigan governor plot) they've got informants everywhere.
But chuds are coping hard by trying to pin the entire event on Ray Epps and whoever else they claim.
Leftoids do the same thing whenever antifa or blm chimp out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah tbh I'd be shocked if they didn't have any undercover assets at jan 6
then again, I'm also shocked they let them into the capitol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I couldnโt watch the whole video because her voice and tone are so hard to listen to without wanting to turn off my phone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context