HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
— The Columbia Bugle πΊπΈ (@ColumbiaBugle) May 18, 2023
Democrat On Weaponization Committee Tries To Expose FBI Whistleblower By Bringing Up His Twitter Activity
Problem: It's Not His Twitter Account pic.twitter.com/f5hJDf6wQH
Do you think she'll fire the zoomer intern who thought it was his account?
Only reddit post I could find. Only 10 comments right now
But maybe someone can help this coomer in /r/Congress
Who is this cute staffer in the FBI Whistleblower meeting next to Sanchez?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Wait, I haven't been paying attention to this, so I'm a bit late.
So the FBI claimed that they didn't have anyone working undercover at the jan 6 rally and now there's this testimony that they actually did have assets in place?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think the FBI head skirted around the question. He didn't say yes or no explicitly because "risk to sources" or whatever.
I'm sure there were undercover officers. They've got plain clothes at basically any major political gathering. Especially when dealing with wingcucks in DC.
Then we repeatedly see (Michigan governor plot) they've got informants everywhere.
But chuds are coping hard by trying to pin the entire event on Ray Epps and whoever else they claim.
Leftoids do the same thing whenever antifa or blm chimp out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah tbh I'd be shocked if they didn't have any undercover assets at jan 6
then again, I'm also shocked they let them into the capitol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context