Are Already Here, Says Stanford Prof With 
, Defense Ties
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a43978705/stanford-professor-says-aliens-are-already-here
Edit: this video of him explaining himself is more thorough than the article itself
edit 2: since this i gaining traction we should all recollect the story of Gary McKinnon and why the US gov wanted to extradite him so badly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon
He claimed to have hacked the pentagon and discovered that the US gov not only had secret alien tech but also had "non-human" officers in the military. He claimed the US gov had craft that looked like this, one called the USS Lemay and another Called the USS Hillenkoetter
Also heres this wierd patent that the US Navy filed back in 2016 https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All the discussion on Reddit surrounding this guy is filled with arrogant morons, just like that of AI. They're all also convinced that a bunch of other paranormal shit is real, along with gnosticism. What is it with UFOs attracting r-slurs that have no intellectual filter?
These people don't realize that the "skepticism" from the scientific community that they malign isn't caused by fear; it's caused by intense dislike of people like them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I actually liked the Garry Nolan vid and I do agree with him about how aliens would "visit" the Earth (i.e. they'd use drones to study us). That's been my thought for a while, although I still somewhat fancy the dark forest hypothesis, as well. I don't necessarily agree with his certainty about the reasoning behind the recent government actions. There's a multitude of explanations for those, not just extraterrestrial intelligence.
I just get tired of people who are so certain about "their" narrative. Aliens/paranormal, neolibs, Marxists, chuds, progressives, singularity. Doesn't matter who.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Regarding the rest of what you just said, plz review the updates i made to this post recently and tell me what you think if you feel like it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm going to give my "wet blanket" feedback since that's what comes naturally to me, lol.
I'd be careful with Salvatore Pais. I remember reading about that years ago and IIRC, he's put forth other very speculative patents (just went looking and found this and this). Some of the skeptical commentary about it was saying that these patents don't really make much sense. I don't have the knowledge to really pick them apart, nor do I have the desire to sift through them and come up with a solid rebuttal, even if I could.
As for why the US govenment would greenlight these patents? Again, this is the US government. The most intriguing "mundane" answer I found is that stuff like this is an elaborate disinformation campaign to trick foreign adversaries into devoting time and resources toward chasing pointless rabbit trails. I also remember reading back when this happened that there was a new higher up in his USN department and that he may have piqued this guy's interest. In other words, he finally found a sympathetic ear who let him file these patents. Finally, speculative stuff like this can start discussions. Maybe the department just wanted to throw the ideas out there and see what came of them.
The first thing I will point out is that this dude is from Britain and that Theresa May blocked the extradition request. If Snowden had been from Britain, I gaurantee you the US would have successfully secured his extradition. The US government doesn't frick around with stuff like this. If he really did cause enough damage to bring down the US Army's systems in Washington for a full 24 hours, then there would have been a lot of very pissed off US officials that wanted his head. Just letting someone get away with a hack of this scale is enough of a risk on its own.
That being said, assuming he wasn't just lying to draw attention to his accomplishment and/or garner public sympathy, he could have very well misinterpretted the documents. He also might have just seen the same pictures/testimonials that have since been publicly released, like that of the cigar UFO. He also made those statements in 2006, 4 years after the hack. He was able to walk around freely up until June 2005 and made these statements a year later. The timing is a bit suspect, to say the least.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A big part of patents is that you have to explain how they work/that they do in the filing. Perhaps its disinfo to get other countries think wr have the tech.
Snowden is a US citezen. Any ally country would hand him over. McKinnon is a UK citizen so thats why he got protection from the UK gov.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, I know. The UK would have extradited Snowden to the US if he was a UK citizen. Assange was gonna be extradited but he fled to the Ecuador embassy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's not at the embassy anymore, but still not in US custody. Also Assange is an Australian citizen not UK so similarly he doesnt have the same rights as a british subject/citizen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He had to stay in the embassy for a decade because European governments were going to extradite him.
...are you being deliberately obtuse? The point is that if there is someone that the US really wants in an allied country, they will get them. If this kid had definitive proof of extraterrestrials obtained from US gov/military servers, then the US government probably would have forced the UK to hand him over. It would not have been something Theresa May could have blocked without immense repercussions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context