A bottom-feeding r-slur from a technology magazine-turned-internet culture wars rag is lurking here, purportedly to interview the c*m-slurping narcissist who runs this shitheap, and we're being prevented from bullying him or otherwise intervening. We all know how this is going to go down, the interloper who shan't be named will ask the spokesjannie some open-ended questions, the spokesjannie will wax pretentious about "alt-tech" and owning dumbass wingcucks, and then the unnamed interloper will publish a boring boilerplate hitpiece about the nazicel hellhole rdrama.net.
That outcome is fricking boring. Consider the alternative:
The janitoids quit acting like redditards and stop censoring mentions of this would-be William Randolph Hearst and his interview with Carp.
Journo piles on the L's as he gets bullied incessantly here and on Twitter by the bored corporate drones and unemployed addicts who spend all their time on rdrama.
Journo writes a long-winded sobpost about online harassment.
Kiwifarms digs up deets on journo, potentially career-ending depending on what gets discovered.
And lastly, but most importantly:
Carp is denied his fifteen minutes of fame.
Alternatively, we could sit back, continue to let funny dox and mentions of a certain username get fricked and chucked, and let some Anton LaVey knockoff get his rocks off at the cost of some well-deserved communal lulz.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm sure
@carpathianflorist 
's interview will go fine. Any publicity is good publicity.
Even destructive publicity.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
which xkcd is that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://xkcd.com/591/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context