So basically there was this REALLY dumb rightoid that would hang out in the groomercords before the election, easily the dumbest rightoid to ever exist in any drama community. He went by "eva" most of the time.
He made a bunch of bets with me and other groomercord users in which he claimed Trump would win Cali/NY etc and become president via a "major landslide." Months in advance I pinned my prediction he'd be back on election night declaring voter fraud and refusing to honor his bets, he then vanished as we mocked him and nobody has seen him again.
I recently encountered this "Johnnyapplesneed" user here that is a rightoid of such incredible r-sluration I seriously think it might be eva, he has a unique r-sluration you won't really find in other rightoids.
Can anyone confirm this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Pizza sneedanddox because he got in an argument with someone that demanded that THEY accept the premise that "conservatives dominate social media".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Literally jut a basic fact about reality, supported by overwhelming proof.
And no, I think he might be eva because he's very clearly an extreme r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's definitely common knowledge and every conservative's experience that social media is for them and them alone. Leftoids just getting banned all the time like flies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are you trying to engage in this weird strawman? Here, let's try this, we're going to walk you into reality.
Is it true or false that the largest political pundits on social media are conservatives?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Since when are "political pundits" proof that social media is a conservative haven?
But no, it's not true.
https://businessinsider.com/democratic-republican-congress-twitter-followings-political-support-2019-2?op=1
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes it is, we aren't talking about elected officials, we're talking about political pundits - the media. The fact you just tried to pull this leads me to believe you know you're wrong and are now leaning into straight r-sluration.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We're actually talking about the broad concept of "social media". You didn't specify political pundits.
You said "conservatives dominate social media".
That's so laughably untrue it's unbelievable except that it's you saying it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes I literally did specify pundits r-slur:
1
It is objectively true by every metric:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You did it AFTER you made your overly broad laughable statement in order to try to yank some kind of a win out of it, r-slur.
It's like you made a statement like "women really dominate the sports world."
And the other party said, "Fam...no...sports tends to be really a male-centric thing..." and you go, "Whaddabout Venus and Serena and women's gymnastics..."
Quotes nakedly partisan pollutico hit piece again.
https://investors.com/politics/editorials/social-media-trump-conservative-bias/
https://pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/15/differences-in-how-democrats-and-republicans-behave-on-twitter/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context