I know this is a popular r*ddit topic, but I'm curious if rdrama bussy conniseurs overwhelmingly have an internal monologue. Despite being tards, the average user here is definitely less tarded than the average r*dditor. The vast majority of people I've seen online claiming they have no internal monologue are foids, which makes sense tbh.
Do you have an internal monologue? And have you accepted that you're a subhuman r-slur if you don't?
- 274
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
gods_chosen_banevader
Current Registered Users: 25,841
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 5ba314d
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
this is an old pol r-slur moment. Internal monologues aren’t real. It’s a false dichotomy. The sages and intelligent white philosophers (Buddha, etc) all understand that these things are subtle and ephemeral and meaningless. I.e. the question is ill posed and that’s the only good response. Believing that you “think in words” or that words are the medium of intelligence is very dumb. Do people do complex math in words? No. What would that mean? Do you see in words? When you want to frick someone, is that a sentence? What? You are an r-slur and fell for stupid rightoid nonsense. Read a book and meditate, lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a Thought cannot exist without Word. all else is Instinct
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I guess Albert Einstein had really good instincts then
there’s just not any form of difference or categorical gap there
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
he was fey-wise, you could say, which is way more valuable than the anglo definition of "intellect"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
sure but that’s as much “””””thinking””””” as anything else so maybe it’s not words lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
there is a clear distinction between thought and instinct
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wow I guess he just had a great instinct for Lorentz invariant four manifolds. not thinking lol nosiree
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
great people are truly an enigma to all of us
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
SOULLESS HUSK DETECTED!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Did you really ask if people do complex math in words? Seriously? Math is full of words. For All, There Exists, And, Or, Implies, Set, Element, In, Group, ... Some words are so usefull that they get given symbols
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah wow almost like interpersonal communication of formalization are different from the things they describe, and we think about both. crazy. wow.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I haven't smoked enough DMT to understand your post, but I'll trust that you're correct wise philosopher of rdrama.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you can have an internal monologue or not. It doesn’t matter. It means nothing
Now, what’s the difference between having and not? Does that matter?
What if someone does but thinks they don’t? Or doesn’t but pretends to and as such does?
It’s a distraction from simply being and doing, and is unrelated to it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context