I know this is a popular r*ddit topic, but I'm curious if rdrama bussy conniseurs overwhelmingly have an internal monologue. Despite being tards, the average user here is definitely less tarded than the average r*dditor. The vast majority of people I've seen online claiming they have no internal monologue are foids, which makes sense tbh.
![House Racist Founder House Racist Founder](https://i.rdrama.net/i/houses/Racist Founder.webp?x=8)
![@JollyJihad's profile picture](https://i.rdrama.net/images/17013804357647011r.webp)
![SHUT IT DOWN, the goys know! @JollyJihad's hat](https://i.rdrama.net/i/hats/The Merchant.webp?x=8)
![:marseyuncleruckus: :marseyuncleruckus:](https://i.rdrama.net/e/marseyuncleruckus.webp)
Do you have an internal monologue? And have you accepted that you're a subhuman r-slur if you don't?
- 274
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
kaamrev
![](https://i.rdrama.net/images/17061067250412173r.webp)
Current Registered Users: 26,409
![sidebar image](https://i.rdrama.net/i/rDrama/sidebar/2464.webp?x=8)
CURRENT EVENTS:
Pride Singing Contest
30K Mbux prize for your gay performancerDrama Pride Events
LAST CALL: Pride event pictures must be submitted by 12am GMT on July 3 (Tuesday 8PM Eastern)Invite Internet Celebs HERE!
100k mbux award possible | Four new badges availableFind Rightoid Infighting
500 mbux per post, no limitDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Live commit: e1523fb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the kinesthetic sense would like a word
edit: I don't disagree that the poll question is, eh, well, it demonstrates the failure of language rather directly, doesn't it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would consider that would be a feeling, not a thought. Thoughts are necessarily structured abstractions of observed reality, i.e. the structuring of a feeling or a set of feelings. Thought flows from feeling, and in turn can incite more feeling. This is the premise of "mindfulness".
I suppose that's where the disconnect exists between our comments.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
but now extend the 'language' of feeling across the logical, the imperative, the contemplative, the symbolic dreamscape, and (I hope) come to understand that these are the true arenas of the life of the mind.
Words are just the social game.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is no "language of feeling" within the model I'm describing. The act of
This is word fluff.
Spare me your condescension. I'm describing a different school of thought within theory of mind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ah, but tres terrible, there is only one reality proper, eh?
A model is self-confessedly of your own creation, da? Models are imitations of the things they are meant to represent.
You decline to introspect? I assure you I meant specific things with each of them. One moment...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you familiar with standpoint theory? I do not consider my approach to be the "correct" one. Is there an objectively correct interpretation of any given piece of art?
Neurology is still in its infancy. Discussions on theory of mind are akin to the pondering of "gentlemen scientists" of the very early modern period.
It seemed like an overlapping, somewhat arbitrary listing of adjectives. What is the definitive distinction between "logical" and "imperative"? Imperative is a description of tonation and intent.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes. a painting of a guy is not a rock. Interpreting it as a rock would be wrong.
βIn its infancyβ no u. I can know things
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So can literally everybody else.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
words not real
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
no difference at all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Says you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
no categorical difference whatsoever. psychology is fake lmao. whatβs the difference?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The difference exists somewhere in this subject.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
feeling vs thought is not about language. both have words for them. animals do both. what
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Feeling is hunger, physical touch, fight or flight, physical attraction. Animals experience these without language. Animals have no capacity for self-reflection and do not recognize feelings as feelings because their feelings are their comprehensive reality.
Humans are capable of abstracting and distinguishing these feelings as separate concepts. By abstracting the concept of hunger as an impulse instead of raw reality, we are able to recognize that hunger itself does not mean we need to eat. I believe animals can "fast" due to their condition, such as injuries, but I've yet to see an animal spontaneously fast in the same way a human will fast religiously.
TBH, you're not wrong. To me it just seems like you're approaching the subject differently than me. This comment is my attempt to provide some basis for what I'm talking about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context