take the money away from the people who have too much.
don't listen to their whining, their excuses.
they look at this sort of talk as biting the hand that feeds them because by their ideology, they're the hand that feeds (even though if you notice, they're the hand that takes).
but by their own ideology, they're failing to feed people.
so since they've failed, it's straightforward. if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.
there really isn't any other way this ends that's legal to speak about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You act as though wealth inequality is a problem, rather than an inevitable result of any system where people are both free to make material choices and free to keep what they own as a result of said choices.
Have you seen the obesity rates? Do you know what a food stamp is?
People are being fed so much it's arguably become a problem.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
as an inevitable result of capitalism, we're not obligated to mindlessly avoid confiscating the wealthy's goods when they're traitors to the state
the problem with wealth inequality is it creates a class that thinks it's above the state
so the state has to make real clear
the state creates money
so the people can do things
and if the people are bad at doing things because they got too much money
that needs to end
none of this mindless capitalist slop
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What treason has been committed to such an extent that it justifies LARPing as Sulla?
The State should be a just arbiter, not a slavedriving master. If I wanted a master I would just go join the GOP and yell about how Trump should be dictator and that he should seize the "woke corporations" or some nonsense like that.
No, the State creates money as a third thing to exchange in a given deal that everyone will accept, and a mutual measure of value. It's so the people can trade things, store wealth, and so the State can print it to fund itself.
If there's not enough supply compared to demand due to them being bad at doing things, that would correct itself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if you're more interested in fleeing to a bunker in New Zealand then you're not motivated to keep your country running
the frick? the state only cares about being a just arbiter to the extent that we can force it to be one, and we are all unwitting slaves to the state because that is our nature
and those who dispense with that money are fulfilling the organ of the State
yeah and we're the fricking correction
you can buy into the ideological apparatus of the rich people in order to prevent giving the system the correction it needs, but
then you're a bootlicker
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can guarantee you that no billionaire would prefer a New Zealand bunker to a mansion. If they flee, it's because there's a problem they can't solve and they're attempting self-preservation, which any sane person would do in their position.
Notice I said should be, i.e. we should force it to as much as possible.
Also our nature being a state of slavery to the State is contradicted by any class that attains the power to do so putting themselves above it in your view.
The correction is inflation not giving more money to said hypothetical nonproductive populations.
I say what I say because I am right and it leads to the best result possible.
There will always be a ruling class, everyone licks a proverbial boot at some point, knowingly or not, and willingly or not.
I just see better outcomes from CEOs than Commissars and more justice from Presidents than CPSU Politburos.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and they have options to defect from the state which creates their money which they just shouldn't have.
no money is slave to money. any time you are talking to a rich person you are talking to a meat suit
but rich people suffer from the delusion that they're the productive population when they're really just an allocation system for the state.
yeah but that ruling class must actually rule and not run away to bunkers when things get hard.
see an old time King had to share in the trouble of his people. the ruler had a hard job and people understood that. nowadays the ruling class wants to have the benefits without the responsibility.
CEOs aren't the problem, the problem is just some people having absurdly more wealth than others.
like if Bezos is so fricking awesome why does amazon kinda suck? If capitalism is so good why is Google arguing with a straight face that their practices aren't anti-competitive? it's like we're stuck with the ills of fricking communism because no one dare touch the Party. we essentially have the same problem communism has: oligarchy. we're lucky we haven't collapsed into a dictatorship yet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
What's funny is all of these statements could easily be written by either a commie, or a fascist.
!nooticers
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The r-slur horseshoe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The fascists defended capital and property rights but here's the attention you ordered.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fascists confesticate and prevent true market competition all the same, their targets are just not "rich people" but "rich people of X", while other rich people have too toil the party line otherwise it's taken away. Same thing, different name.
white extinction is long overdue
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The methods and rhetoric are the same regardless of the stated goal of defending capital or abolishing it.
Thats what both extremes dont get; the ends dont justify the means. The journey > the destination
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
π π
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you ask online leftoids where anyone is going hungry in the United States they often will start talking about something else, usually food deserts or βfood insecurityβ (which they can't define)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you really haven't understood climate change yet lmao
like you think our food supply won't get affected? lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In the USA? Probably not lol, we have enough excess for farming to remain viable. Worst case scenario, we annex Canada.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the problem is climate change + energy crisis
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Canada also has plenty of oil, so my idea remains viable.
We could also always ramp up nuclear production as well. The rest of the world might burn but as long as you don't live in Phoenix or LA or something we'll pull through.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
under the neoliberal world order annexing Canada has already been done, in effect. that's the point of capitalism after all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See! The wisdom of Roosevelt's American Empire.
Any solution to the rest of the world will likely be technological - fusion, orbital mirrors, or some other ideas that will loosen the energy crunch or the climate failures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Worst case we hit Alaska which has 3x the land size of Texas, California, and Montana combined lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is your brain on radlibism. Doesn't even talk about abolishing private property or securing the means of production, just wants the goberment to give more gibs lmao.
Tie every social democrat to a rock and drop them into the ocean pls ty.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
oh it's not about the gibs
it's about the takes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Changes nothing. Redistribution is cope, only abolition of private property counts you succdem.
Every Portland brained mayo radlib should be misgendered and then thrown into a giant blender.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
when are you going to move on from misgendering? to me it only reads as a sign of your own continued sexual confusion lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because it upsets identity-obsessed radlib mayos who think it's a grievous offense lol. Even the idea that without them one would be sexually confused is pure capitalist liberal ideology.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude you're way too online
No I'm saying that the fact that you spend your time making stupid gender confusion jokes is a preoccupation with queer identity that I don't think most people have. Why are you so preoccupied with gender identity? Because you're not owning the libs, you're just living permanently in a weird fictitious argument that doesn't matter.
Even the people who have been outraged at being misgendered have let go of it. You're still holding onto it. What gives?
cc
@HeyMoonster
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The united states food supply is very secure, the bread basket at worst will move slightly while remaining in us territory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I have no idea what you mean but I agree that it is very scary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
People can suffer from malnutrition and still be fat. The goyslop diet; it's all burgers deserve.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree, that's why I support banning the purchase of Soda or other slop using EBT/SNAP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't it already restricted to groceries?
If it isn't it should be.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but groceries includes almost everything edible, including Coke, but not paper towels (something actually useful)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah more processed comfort foods should be removed from EBT payability, I agree.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Then that's a regulatory issue on the food production level, not a "poors need more money, burn Bezos's house" issue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context