.webp?x=8 "Jester Hat (blue and purple) - Hand wash only")
take the money away from the people who have too much.
don't listen to their whining, their excuses.
they look at this sort of talk as biting the hand that feeds them because by their ideology, they're the hand that feeds (even though if you notice, they're the hand that takes).
but by their own ideology, they're failing to feed people.
so since they've failed, it's straightforward. if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.
there really isn't any other way this ends that's legal to speak about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Just get a better job lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah if my IQ was over 80 maybe i'd do that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!r-slurs IMPORTANT VIDEO
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You don't have to be smart
to be a welder smdh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
welders probably do more mental math than I do as a codecel lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
God I wish I wasn't r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You act as though wealth inequality is a problem, rather than an inevitable result of any system where people are both free to make material choices and free to keep what they own as a result of said choices.
Have you seen the obesity rates? Do you know what a food stamp is?
People are being fed so much it's arguably become a problem.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
as an inevitable result of capitalism, we're not obligated to mindlessly avoid confiscating the wealthy's goods when they're traitors to the state
the problem with wealth inequality is it creates a class that thinks it's above the state
so the state has to make real clear
the state creates money
so the people can do things
and if the people are bad at doing things because they got too much money
that needs to end
none of this mindless capitalist slop
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What's funny is all of these statements could easily be written by either a commie, or a fascist.
!nooticers
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The r-slur horseshoe
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The fascists defended capital and property rights but here's the attention you ordered.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fascists confesticate and prevent true market competition all the same, their targets are just not "rich people" but "rich people of X", while other rich people have too toil the party line otherwise it's taken away. Same thing, different name.
white extinction is long overdue
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The methods and rhetoric are the same regardless of the stated goal of defending capital or abolishing it.
Thats what both extremes dont get; the ends dont justify the means. The journey > the destination
Trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
π π
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
What treason has been committed to such an extent that it justifies LARPing as Sulla?
The State should be a just arbiter, not a slavedriving master. If I wanted a master I would just go join the GOP and yell about how Trump should be dictator and that he should seize the "woke corporations" or some nonsense like that.
No, the State creates money as a third thing to exchange in a given deal that everyone will accept, and a mutual measure of value. It's so the people can trade things, store wealth, and so the State can print it to fund itself.
If there's not enough supply compared to demand due to them being bad at doing things, that would correct itself.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
if you're more interested in fleeing to a bunker in New Zealand then you're not motivated to keep your country running
the frick? the state only cares about being a just arbiter to the extent that we can force it to be one, and we are all unwitting slaves to the state because that is our nature
and those who dispense with that money are fulfilling the organ of the State
yeah and we're the fricking correction
you can buy into the ideological apparatus of the rich people in order to prevent giving the system the correction it needs, but
then you're a bootlicker
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can guarantee you that no billionaire would prefer a New Zealand bunker to a mansion. If they flee, it's because there's a problem they can't solve and they're attempting self-preservation, which any sane person would do in their position.
Notice I said should be, i.e. we should force it to as much as possible.
Also our nature being a state of slavery to the State is contradicted by any class that attains the power to do so putting themselves above it in your view.
The correction is inflation not giving more money to said hypothetical nonproductive populations.
I say what I say because I am right and it leads to the best result possible.
There will always be a ruling class, everyone licks a proverbial boot at some point, knowingly or not, and willingly or not.
I just see better outcomes from CEOs than Commissars and more justice from Presidents than CPSU Politburos.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and they have options to defect from the state which creates their money which they just shouldn't have.
no money is slave to money. any time you are talking to a rich person you are talking to a meat suit
but rich people suffer from the delusion that they're the productive population when they're really just an allocation system for the state.
yeah but that ruling class must actually rule and not run away to bunkers when things get hard.
see an old time King had to share in the trouble of his people. the ruler had a hard job and people understood that. nowadays the ruling class wants to have the benefits without the responsibility.
CEOs aren't the problem, the problem is just some people having absurdly more wealth than others.
like if Bezos is so fricking awesome why does amazon kinda suck? If capitalism is so good why is Google arguing with a straight face that their practices aren't anti-competitive? it's like we're stuck with the ills of fricking communism because no one dare touch the Party. we essentially have the same problem communism has: oligarchy. we're lucky we haven't collapsed into a dictatorship yet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
If you ask online leftoids where anyone is going hungry in the United States they often will start talking about something else, usually food deserts or βfood insecurityβ (which they can't define)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you really haven't understood climate change yet lmao
like you think our food supply won't get affected? lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In the USA? Probably not lol, we have enough excess for farming to remain viable. Worst case scenario, we annex Canada.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the problem is climate change + energy crisis
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Canada also has plenty of oil, so my idea remains viable.
We could also always ramp up nuclear production as well. The rest of the world might burn but as long as you don't live in Phoenix or LA or something we'll pull through.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
under the neoliberal world order annexing Canada has already been done, in effect. that's the point of capitalism after all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See! The wisdom of Roosevelt's American Empire.
Any solution to the rest of the world will likely be technological - fusion, orbital mirrors, or some other ideas that will loosen the energy crunch or the climate failures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Worst case we hit Alaska which has 3x the land size of Texas, California, and Montana combined lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is your brain on radlibism. Doesn't even talk about abolishing private property or securing the means of production, just wants the goberment to give more gibs lmao.
Tie every social democrat to a rock and drop them into the ocean pls ty.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
oh it's not about the gibs
it's about the takes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Changes nothing. Redistribution is cope, only abolition of private property counts you succdem.
Every Portland brained mayo radlib should be misgendered and then thrown into a giant blender.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
when are you going to move on from misgendering? to me it only reads as a sign of your own continued sexual confusion lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because it upsets identity-obsessed radlib mayos who think it's a grievous offense lol. Even the idea that without them one would be sexually confused is pure capitalist liberal ideology.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude you're way too online
No I'm saying that the fact that you spend your time making stupid gender confusion jokes is a preoccupation with queer identity that I don't think most people have. Why are you so preoccupied with gender identity? Because you're not owning the libs, you're just living permanently in a weird fictitious argument that doesn't matter.
Even the people who have been outraged at being misgendered have let go of it. You're still holding onto it. What gives?
cc
@HeyMoonster
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The united states food supply is very secure, the bread basket at worst will move slightly while remaining in us territory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I have no idea what you mean but I agree that it is very scary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
People can suffer from malnutrition and still be fat. The goyslop diet; it's all burgers deserve.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree, that's why I support banning the purchase of Soda or other slop using EBT/SNAP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isn't it already restricted to groceries?
If it isn't it should be.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but groceries includes almost everything edible, including Coke, but not paper towels (something actually useful)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah more processed comfort foods should be removed from EBT payability, I agree.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Then that's a regulatory issue on the food production level, not a "poors need more money, burn Bezos's house" issue.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
there's really only one way to address wealth inequality and it's simple
Kill the poor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The American dream
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When has this happened
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not black you fricking rightoid CUTE TWINK!!!! SISSY
CUTE TWINK!!! USING THIS LINE ISN'T A fricking FREE PASS TO MAKING SHIT UP!!!!!
Jesus Christ is a fricking total cute twink by the fricking way. He got a fricking little baby boner when he got crucified and he definitely likes getting penetrated by the fricking shit-covered peepees of muhammad and a fricking pig :)))))))))
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not saying you're black I'm saying you can't understand the hypothetical consequences of forced wealth distribution that may or may not happen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but think of all the people you just helped by selling your assets.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd rather you sell your body.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
RFV, I'll take it as a compliment, but we all know you don't like having s*x with men.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'M TRYING TO CHANGE, OK?!?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're just making shit up fricking R-SLUR, motherlover! God, I hate rightoids so much. What if your stupid post made everyone reading kill themselves, b-word? What if, b-word? Oh, is fricking that a fricking stupid comment to make, b-word? NO IT MUST BE THAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE fricking R-SLURRED OR SOMETHING, motherlover! Fricking rightoid CUTE TWINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Frick am I replying to one of
@HeyMoonster's projects again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm so happy in the CongoL 9mo ago #5132524 spent 0 currency on pingsThe LLM are getting incredibly good, I never even noticed. The only tell is that 3000 comments since June isn't possible.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The biggest tell for now is the short term memory loss or recurring keywords that they're probably restating from their initial prompt.
But it takes a few messages before you get a feel for it and by then it already looks like you took the bait
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why do I get accused of being alts all the time? I'm just chadding out
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It is prevented from happening by there being no wealth tax.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zoz
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
zozzle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Stealing from the rich is anti-semetism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
wealth is created by delaying gratification.
if you take all the money above $1M and redistribute it to all the poors, each poor gets about $20k and they'll waste that on rare sneakers and chrome rims.
remember the free covid money and how long it took for most poors to waste that? in the US people are poor mainly because they waste their money on stupid shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
delaying gratification is just part of wealth, you also have to be lucky
this isn't about redistribution actually, it's just about ending extreme wealth inequality
don't overcomplicate it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wut? in the OP you say we need too redistribute the wealth, how it not about redistribution?
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
you're just gonna concentrate wealth in the hands of those rich folks whose wealth is based on tricking poors into wasting all their money.
you'll take money from the people who innovate in e.g. biotech or chemical engineering, and hand it to people who innovate in funko pops, luxury sneakers, food delivery, and las vegas.
this is already happening of course, half the economy is built around handing money to idiots so they can spend it on scams. then the people running the scams have enough funding to ensure the government keeps handing money to those idiots (e.g. women).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
we could just kill anyone who's not a net positive taxpayer for idk >3yrs in a row
or, better yet, get rid of both taxes and welfare so ppl live or die by their own merit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
As long as you take from the fricking people who make more than I do, then yes. Also welfare goes to thins only
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that's the brilliance of "We are the 99%"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
don't listen to their winning
FTFY!
!slots420
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
that's what taxes are
problem is gen pop is too content with a lazy life to even be able to decide what or who to vote for so that taxes get collected and distributed properly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Kill the poor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
For me, it's reducing worldwide population to sub 10 million
so we can continue our current lifestyle carefree
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You couldn't replicate the enter supply chain for a toaster with 1 million people. And that's just one good.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't need toasters. Literally
never 
owned 
one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
but you know you would be one of the reduced ones dont you?
trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, duh lol I've taken school
tests before 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Huh, ten million was what I figured too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The opposite must happen, ever greater economies of scale. Our fate must be in the stars, not in the Sentinel Islands.
Also 10m carrying capacity is for literal anprim life not any industrial system.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
10 mil was enough for early industrial era UK
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I meant that was about the maximum amount of humans Earth could sustain under an Anprim level of tech.
Also I doubt you'd like the reversion to the complexity levels of the early Industrial period in the UK.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The difference is we have the technology
and knowledge now. It renders 90% of humans obsolete.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I need to groom you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
100,000 people is more than you'll ever meet and in the case of particularly unadventurous people, more than they'll ever see.
100 of those is enough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol based
and reduction pilled
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I don't see why they don't just seize everything from the top 1000 richest people and throw them in jail if they resist. Say it's national security or something that nullifies consequences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because assuming you could actually liquidate the wealth you'd be able to run the country for like a month on it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Have you tried kill all the poor?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Shut your whore peepee sucker. The only value you have to society is being a Prime member.
Now that we got that over with buy this pay pig.
Certified Peepee Sucker T-Shirt https://a.co/d/0EWss1y
Free sameday shipping on orders $25 or more. Get 5% cash back with the Amazon store card.
Frick you pay me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
how poor are you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's like... what, 2 houses in urban California?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A single condo in San Francisco.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More like four fifths of a single home in urban California.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I was being generous with my definition of "urban" tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
"Stop being poor." Done.
No, it really boils down to people are unable to leverage credit properly to their advantage, and people delay marriage which in todays age would halve your problems. $100k is a top 10% salary in the US, the average john and jane shacking up would have an income close to or higher than that. My friend earns $72k annually and his wife earns $50k, alone thats not super great but combined its tremendous wealth. They can pay off each others student loans in half a decade as one salary pays for life and the other kills debts. Home ownership with a low mortgage due to a high down is feasible. Being poor is literally making the dumbest financial decisions possible time after time for years if not decades.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How about we liquidate the poors and feed them to real humans
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Imagine thinking a million dollars is all it takes to live rich. Show me your portfolio dirtleg.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
What percentile are you?
https://howrichami.givingwhatwecan.org/how-rich-am-i
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Apparently I'm on the top 12% wtf lmfao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ewww poor
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Always have been
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
If it's worldwide, keep in mind the US is like 4% of the world's population, and adding Western Europe and Japan/SK/RoC and the ex-British settler colonies to it get it to maybe 10%?
Just being in the middle in the West puts you around that % worldwide or higher.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Passport bros, we're gonna
make it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
No way this is accurate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Largely accurate. The West is so much richer than the rest of the world, and America is about twice as rich as the rest of the West. What percentile are you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even very pessimisticly on tax withholdings 1%
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
So true king. I understand that wealth confiscation and redistribution is often politically unviable, but that's only if you continue to allow the rich people to live. If you put them all in camps in Siberia and forbid them from leaving the problem will sort itself out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
We just need to reduce the rate of return on private capital until it's less than the rate of growth for a generation. Then inequality will fix itself!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the opposite, actually
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Ah, another lefty with zero ro understanding of how the economy works.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The poors have too much money.
Furry rights are human rights.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context