.webp?x=8 "Jester Hat (blue and purple) - Hand wash only")
take the money away from the people who have too much.
don't listen to their whining, their excuses.
they look at this sort of talk as biting the hand that feeds them because by their ideology, they're the hand that feeds (even though if you notice, they're the hand that takes).
but by their own ideology, they're failing to feed people.
so since they've failed, it's straightforward. if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.
there really isn't any other way this ends that's legal to speak about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't see why they don't just seize everything from the top 1000 richest people and throw them in jail if they resist. Say it's national security or something that nullifies consequences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because assuming you could actually liquidate the wealth you'd be able to run the country for like a month on it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context