Unable to load image
Reported by:

there's really only one way to address wealth inequality and it's simple

take the money away from the people who have too much.

don't listen to their whining, their excuses.

they look at this sort of talk as biting the hand that feeds them because by their ideology, they're the hand that feeds (even though if you notice, they're the hand that takes).

but by their own ideology, they're failing to feed people.

so since they've failed, it's straightforward. if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.

there really isn't any other way this ends that's legal to speak about.

40
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wealth is created by delaying gratification.

if you take all the money above $1M and redistribute it to all the poors, each poor gets about $20k and they'll waste that on rare sneakers and chrome rims.

remember the free covid money and how long it took for most poors to waste that? in the US people are poor mainly because they waste their money on stupid shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

delaying gratification is just part of wealth, you also have to be lucky

this isn't about redistribution actually, it's just about ending extreme wealth inequality

don't overcomplicate it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you're just gonna concentrate wealth in the hands of those rich folks whose wealth is based on tricking poors into wasting all their money.

you'll take money from the people who innovate in e.g. biotech or chemical engineering, and hand it to people who innovate in funko pops, luxury sneakers, food delivery, and las vegas.

this is already happening of course, half the economy is built around handing money to idiots so they can spend it on scams. then the people running the scams have enough funding to ensure the government keeps handing money to those idiots (e.g. women).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

this isn't about redistribution actually, it's just about ending extreme wealth inequality

don't overcomplicate it

wut? in the OP you say we need too redistribute the wealth, how it not about redistribution?

trans lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.

>this isn't about redistribution actually

:marseysmug2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.