take the money away from the people who have too much.
don't listen to their whining, their excuses.
they look at this sort of talk as biting the hand that feeds them because by their ideology, they're the hand that feeds (even though if you notice, they're the hand that takes).
but by their own ideology, they're failing to feed people.
so since they've failed, it's straightforward. if you have assets valued at above a cool million, you lose those assets and they become distributed and a new round begins.
there really isn't any other way this ends that's legal to speak about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you really haven't understood climate change yet lmao
like you think our food supply won't get affected? lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is your brain on radlibism. Doesn't even talk about abolishing private property or securing the means of production, just wants the goberment to give more gibs lmao.
Tie every social democrat to a rock and drop them into the ocean pls ty.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
oh it's not about the gibs
it's about the takes
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Changes nothing. Redistribution is cope, only abolition of private property counts you succdem.
Every Portland brained mayo radlib should be misgendered and then thrown into a giant blender.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
when are you going to move on from misgendering? to me it only reads as a sign of your own continued sexual confusion lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because it upsets identity-obsessed radlib mayos who think it's a grievous offense lol. Even the idea that without them one would be sexually confused is pure capitalist liberal ideology.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude you're way too online
No I'm saying that the fact that you spend your time making stupid gender confusion jokes is a preoccupation with queer identity that I don't think most people have. Why are you so preoccupied with gender identity? Because you're not owning the libs, you're just living permanently in a weird fictitious argument that doesn't matter.
Even the people who have been outraged at being misgendered have let go of it. You're still holding onto it. What gives?
cc
@HeyMoonster
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What happened to your disaffected all lowercase posting style Mr. Revolutionary? Your even CCing Moony you're so shook lmao, I can tell this really got under your skin you fatbody radlib mayo. I have you accurately pegged as the type of temporarily embarrassed failson that is attracted to social democrat policies under the guise of being leftoid, and it's upsetting you.
Where do you keep getting this weird butt cope fiction from dummy? The identitytards that love their pronouns are still seething over le one joke and consider it tantamount to genocide. Besides, mocking queer identity pronouns isn't an uncommon opinion irl or online anyways, it's a very standard viewpoint you see outside of straggot city centers in Portland, corporate HR depts, and college campuses. Which are all overwhelmingly white and affluent strongholds of capitalist ideology, no matter how revolutionary they may pretend to be.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lmao I got serious to pick at your vulnerability
which makes it a stupid weak insult
I pinged HeyMoon because you're a specimen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Wasn't βWhat is a womanβ a big angst generator from a few years back? At least some people get very heated over βmisgenderingβ to this very dayβ¦
For me, I just call them whatever pronoun is easier to remember and makes more sense in the moment. Some people project a βmasculine auraβ, some project a βfeminine auraβ, so I just call them whatever pronoun aligns with the aura.
Humorously, misgendering someone is at times more work than just calling them the proper gender lol.
The biggest problem with requiring people to use the βproper pronounsβ is that it really comes off as an attempt to force people into a worldview that they might not have, that a person can be a woman in a man's body. I think it's similar to calling the Pope βhis holinessββ¦ which is a title a lot of people would be uncomfortable calling him.
I think there are some big problems with the βgender is not s*xβ argument, for instance, I think it is a circular argument, and is unprovable. (Apart from extremely dubious studies by liberal think tanks π)
Despite that, I still like my transbros. A lot of them are people that are on a spiritual journey to understand their own identity, which I vibe with. Yeah, not every man likes football, lol, some men like flowers and shit, which I understand because nature is cool. So I try to respect them even though I don't agree with them.
My big line is βdon't cut off their peepeees or give them estrogenβ because there is a really big chance it is just a phase they are going through and also because the surgery is ghoulish and doesn't actually make you a woman/man and ruins your ability to ever have s*x, which is awesome.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a few years back, yes, but that's what makes rightoid so defeated: they're stuck repeating the old hits hoping they still come out
this is, in point of fact, its strength. most of our axioms are resting on circular definitions, and that's ok
idk if I really believe that the medical industry isn't going to do a better job figuring out when it is and isn't a good idea to give kids transition surgery than a bunch of online bickering
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Impressive. Normally people with such severe developmental disabilities struggle to write much more than a sentence or two. He really has exceded our expectations for the writing portion. Sadly the coherency of his writing, along with his abilities in the social skills and reading portions, are far behind his peers with similar disabilities.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
In the USA? Probably not lol, we have enough excess for farming to remain viable. Worst case scenario, we annex Canada.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the problem is climate change + energy crisis
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Canada also has plenty of oil, so my idea remains viable.
We could also always ramp up nuclear production as well. The rest of the world might burn but as long as you don't live in Phoenix or LA or something we'll pull through.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
under the neoliberal world order annexing Canada has already been done, in effect. that's the point of capitalism after all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
See! The wisdom of Roosevelt's American Empire.
Any solution to the rest of the world will likely be technological - fusion, orbital mirrors, or some other ideas that will loosen the energy crunch or the climate failures.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Worst case we hit Alaska which has 3x the land size of Texas, California, and Montana combined lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The united states food supply is very secure, the bread basket at worst will move slightly while remaining in us territory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I have no idea what you mean but I agree that it is very scary
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context