https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/alex-jones-and-his-conspiracy-theories-are-allowed-back-on-x-160419044.html
- 182
- 86
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 28,684
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Current software version: 28ea582
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can I just point out you always try to do this weird psychoanalysis thing with me and it never works. There's no cognitive dissonance because I know Alex Jones did the things he was accused of because I watch his show. Seriously, there's better ways to try and get me to seethe because this one never works. Stick with extolling Alex's virtues or something because that always bugs me. Or just tell me climate change isn't real. That'll really get me going.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well climate change is real, the only real thing in the world is change and that applies to the climate as well. As far as the greenhouse gas theory and the steps globalist organizations want to implement to curb it is where I, or any thinking person, take issue with.
I don't believe in psychoanalysis but I can see plain as day when someone denies something they know is true in order to stay "secure" in the sense of not facing questioning their own beliefs, opinions, or biases. The ego resists even in the face of death, much less a matter of minor disagreement like this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not against re thinking any of my beliefs or opinions, I don't hold them all that dearly. But to you, climate change is gospel as an example
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do better
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But it's true isn't it? you pointed it out because it's one of those beliefs you hold onto so dearly you would never question or re think?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can we be real for a second, since we're deep into replies that no one will read? I don't hold it as a sacred cow. I hold that belief because of a ponderance of evidence. It's pretty overwhelming. I mean think about it for a minute: imagine if we were wrong about CO2 trapping heat. What would that mean? It would mean that our basic understanding of physics and chemistry is completely wrong. But if our basic understanding of physics is completely wrong then how are we making things based on physics? How does your cell phone work if we don't understand the very basics of chemistry and physics? CO2 traps heat. This isn't in doubt. There's some argument and quibbles over how much of an effect it's going to have and that's fair. But overall, global warming is real and it's caused by people. If you want a great examination of the actual data, I recommend this series: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL82yk73N8eoX-Xobr_TfHsWPfAIyI7VAP
On an unrelated note, and I'm really trying to help you here, if you want people to think that you're not actually seething, make sure to upmarsey them. When you constantly side vote me while arguing with me, I know you're the one seething.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thats where you're dead wrong. You go OUT OF YOUR WAY to provide an upmarsey in order to prove that you aren't seething. I'm simply not agreeing with the things you say so an upmarsey isn't appropriate, nor does what you say bother me enough to downmarsey. I didn't even check the votes BTW so who is seething?
and no, not all of our physics or chemistry hinges on the idea of man made climate change, not even close.
If you want to learn more Tony Heller is a good source
but at the end of the day, you have to look at WHO is pushing this agenda and HOW they plan to curb it. Once you start thinking from solution backwards into problem then it seems more clear. They have a specific goal and agenda and it isn't to benefit the avg citizen
also on a more metaphysical front
\Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Imagine not upmarseying views you disagree with
You can't even bring yourself to do that, but I'm the one that's seething? Lol
Oh absolutely. I think there is a glut of climate change grifters out there and if they were truly serious about doing something they would be pushing for nuclear power which is the number one transitional energy source. We can't just stop using energy. Millions, perhaps billions would die from starvation etc. Not only that, but it's really hard to express how intertwined our entire global economy is with petroleum products. It's going to take a global effort to fix this and at present some of the worst offenders are countries like India and China. I'm under no illusions. America's actually been doing pretty well about reducing emissions. But we can't do it by ourselves. Countries like China should be called out.
I'm going to loop this back into Alex Jones now. If you really want to know why he was punished so severely, I really recommend watching all of the depositions and reading through all the court filings. He wasn't punished for bad words or whatever. He was punished because he consistently made a mockery of the justice system while acting like he was above it. Is it any surprise that he was butt fricked by the justice system? You can't shit all over the process and then complain about the process. The funniest part is he actually had a decent defense if he had bothered to mount one, but he decided that instead he would consistently tell the court to go frick themselves. That went poorly.
I'm not at all surprised by the actions of the jury. Considering that he insulted the jury, he insulted the judge, and he continued to defame the plaintiffs during the trial. He withheld evidence, he refused to participate in discovery, and acted like a total butthole. Are there worse people like the sacklers? Yes. Does he deserve a 1.6 billion judgment? Probably not. But he deserves to lose any profits he's ever made from Infowars, and that's the consequence he'll have to live with.
You're not able to actually analyze these issues from a neutral standpoint, but I think spending enough time here, you'll get there.
Did you watch that YouTube series I link to?
Oh shit I knew I knew that name. Potholer54 has debated him extensively and it didn't go well for Tony.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd6ODXWkxEcjUo8whgmZAuUMGiwjhzs0a
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context