Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is a "loli" just an "anime drawing of a kid" or is it specifically a "sexualized anime drawing of a kid"? if the latter then def yes. if the former probably yes with some exceptions

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Loli is short for Lolita, which comes from the book. The book is about an adult professor being attracted to a 12 year old girl.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have read the book, it's pretty good. Nabokov is really talented at prose.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>coping loli lover coincidentally also likes Lolita

darn neighbor slow down

:marseyxd#:

:marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo: :marseypedo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyconfused:

The book is not pro-libertarian at all. It shows the main character as a complete narcisist who's obssesed with a kid

!bookworms this :marseyfivehead: thinks Lolita is a pro-libertarianism book

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who believe Lolita is pro pedophilia should seriously read the book. Is very clear to the reader that Humbert Humbert is a monster with no self awareness, it just happens that he's a fun and witty character (the parts he kept trashing Lolita's mom calling her fat cow lmao) instead of a one-dimensional villain but that's because he's supposed to be charming, always luring people towards him like a predator, and we only read through his point of view, he kidnapped and r*ped a 12 year old girl and by the time she was 14 he called her “my aging mistress”, there was nothing redeemable about him.

!bookworms

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The entire book is also told from his PoV. He's a narcissist with an inflated ego, he's always the smartest, most charming and handsome guy anywhere he goes.

In the same tone he tells us he's a :marseygigachad: he also tells us Lolita loves him, it might all also be in his head :marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think Mrs. Haze was definitely enchanted by the whole “sophisticated European man” façade he put, I'm also convinced he killed her, the accident was waaay too convenient and just a few pages before he tells the reader he planned to drown her at the lake.

he also tells us Lolita loves him, it might all also be in his head :marseyhmm:

The parts where he claims Dolores “seduced him” are so cringe and is either all made up or something he completely misinterpreted in his sick mind.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's been a while since I read it so I've forgotten a good chunk of the details

Esses dias tava na academia e vendo a moça na minha frente :marseybooba: me lembrei dele falando sobre as "coxas grossas de camponesa" da mulher. Ele certamente não ficaria feliz no mundo atual :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

nabokov writes a generationally seethe generating book that separates people who cant understand what theyre reading from those that can, gives lectures to an all woman college about how women cant write, is there anything this man couldnt do?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Kubrick movie shows this too, maybe not as effectively, but he's still a total creep

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can't believe @NewMoon just outed himself as needing a "/s" for an entire novel. :smh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lolita is a pro-libertarianism book

It is if you have an iq below 90. look at the average /r/books thread talking about it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's widely considered to be one of the best books of all time :#marseyindignant:

I may be unable to read past the first page without feeling like too much of a creep to continue but i will still defend it :#marseycrusader:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ironically the first few pages are the only ones that make you sympathetic to the main character. He becomes more and more of an unlikeable creep as the book goes on.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah okay in that case it is pedophilia

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How did the japanese end up using it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because it's a classic book? :marseyconfused:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It comes from the book Lolita, which is about a forty year old man sexually abusing a pre-pubescent girl, so take a wild guess

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseycry: i kinda thought it was like lollis like how britbongs talk about lollipops or whatever because kids like lollipops :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This neighbor so r-slurred 💔 :marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you have a creative mind :marseysmirk:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyretardchad#:

yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wtf i thought it was lollipops too

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybrainlet: 🤝🏻 :!marseybrainlet:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

or is it specifically a "sexualized anime drawing of a kid"

Yes. It is associated with underage female characters being shown in a sexual manner.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

what the frick is wrong with moids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's funny because I think it's the opposite. I find the grown men "crushing" on kids acting like kids way creepier than the hentais where they draw a 10yo with DD breasts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywoozy: neighbor both are bad lmao

i was talking about shit like leave it to beaver in anime form or something lmao, nobody wants to frick beaver they just think he's a funny kid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sorry I don't get the reference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Leave it to Beaver, it's an old, wholesome show about a dumb kid named Beaver who gets up to all sorts of nonsense. My point was that just because you're watching a show with a kid in it, it doesn't make it sexual or weird. but ur talking about people who are like, sexually interested in kids. in which case yeah that's pedophilia neighbor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd be very sus if @Mello_luvr worked with a dude who had a leave it too beaver wallpaper or whatever the contemporary option is. Or if you meet a dude at work who watches drake and Josh, you wouldn't find that sus?

White extinction is long overdue :marseybow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.