Person in monogamous relationship upset that partner wants to be monogamous, insists on right to keep telling partner they might want to score bussy sometime. Then makes seethe comic about it.

Ugh, my ex did something similar, insisted that I have to be pan because bi means two and by saying I was bi, I was being transphobic and disregarding other identities

if you google "bi umbrella" you'll have pics explaining it shortly, but basically Bi is an umbrella that means "i like two or more genders"

Under this umbrella falls 4 main attraction types, ill explain with exemples:

Anna is pansexual. She is what she would call "genderblind" : a person's gender doesnt matter at all in her attraction. You can say she cares about the person regardless of the gender, to oversimplify it

Jean is omnisexual. Just like anna, he does like everyone. But he think that men are hotter, while still being attracted to women are non binary people. A person's gender does matter in the way he feels about that person

July is polysexual : they're attracted to women and non binary people on the feminine spectrum, but dont seem to have any feelings with masculine people. Though they have a preference, let's say for non binary people.

Finally, Antonio is multisexual. Like july, he like women, but also non binary people. But unlike them, he doesnt have a preference. He's kind of a pansexual but only for non-men

At the end of the day, these labels are only really useful in very specific cases. That's why all these people use the bisexual umbrella very often! I hope i was clear in my explanation :>

I took brain damage reading this, you all should suffer too.

Where's the next panel that shows a few years later the bi-kween ended up married to a straggot moid.

From a lesbian perspective the idea that your partner is into peepees as well when you don't have one must be uncomfortable(for some).

Bi meme subs make me biphobic.

Let me tell you this-- rdrama.net is one of the most malevolent, cruel, coldhearted online communities you'll ever find, and even as a supporter of free speech it appalls me that the internet would allow such a vile, festering hub of bigotry and sadism to exist. You think [slur]town was bad? That website, if you pick up on the dog-whistles (and many don't even bother with that-- say want you want about Stormfront, at least it bans "n[slur]"), will reveal itself to you as the internet's number one hub for the web's most hardened Nazis, Klansmen, Fascists, and G*mergaters. You'll notice on the description that it encourages members to be as dramatic as possible. That's intentional. They encourage arguments in the comments section. That's intentional. You know the Three Minute Hate (it's from this underrated book 1985, give it a read, it's scary how much it parallels our society)? It's like that, they want to stoke the flames of reactionary rage so they continue to dogpile every progressive and minority who enters the website, normalizing these evil feelings. They brigade from website to website, having an entire cabal of admins spanning hundreds of communities, gaslighting lived experiences of the oppressed and unashamedly bolstering the internet's white supremacy movement. They've kink-shamed hundreds of people too, some even... to death. I fear that rdrama.net may be producing an entire army of Dylann Roofs and Elliot Rogers, and I highly suggest that nobody dares visit that horrible website, lest you potentially fall victim to its corruptive aura.

Snapshots:

• reveddit.com
• archive.org
• archive.ph (click to archive)