@Wojak posted this in the Aella gangbang thread earlier
And it really made me think. With so many young people saying you're no longer allowed to kink shame, I was wondering if the science could prove that in the era of easy access to porn and the growing gooner lifestyle, bodily harm has been on the rise. Naturally I thought bussy accidents would be the first place to search. I started looking for an increase in rectal prolapse (accidentally saw a thumbnail of a BIPOCs butthole hanging out btw. It was very red. ) , but I couldn't find anything concrete. It mostly just seems to be 70+ year old foid bussys falling out (in Korea at least). Then I saw an article about RFBs: RECTAL FOREIGN BODIES
Burgers
Epidemiology and healthcare utilization for rectal foreign bodies in United States adults, 2012–2021
From 885 cases, there were an estimated 38,948 (95% CI, 32,040-45,856) emergency department visits for rectal foreign bodies among individuals ≥15 years from 2012 to 2021. The average age was 43, 77.8% were male, 55.4% of foreign bodies were sexual devices, and 40.8% required hospitalization. The annual incidence of presentations for rectal foreign bodies increased from 1.2 in 2012 to 1.9 per 100,000 persons in 2021 (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.01).
1.2 to 1.9, that's pretty significant. I think. 77.8% were male
One study "found that 93% of operative cases were males" So scrotes really be shoving things up there.
Males have a bimodal age distribution peaking in the fifth decade, while females have a right-skewed age distribution peaking in the second decade.
I don't speak science, but I interpret this to mean scrotes are pressuring teenage foids to do anal stuff, while the scrotal anal degeneracy continues well into middle age.
98% of the time there was one object in the burger butt. Only 1% of the time there were multiple objects. Absolute chads. Imagine being the 98% Losers!
Other countries
Data from Sweden, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the Caribbean suggest that the incidence of medical evaluations for retained RFB is increasing among adults
Which brings us to
Rectal foreign body removal: increasing incidence and cost to the NHS
A total of 3,500 rectal foreign bodies were removed over the course of 9 years. Males accounted for 85.1% of rectal foreign bodies whilst 14.9% were females. This equates to 348 bed-days per annum. Admission peaks were observed in the second and fifth decades of life.
Foids really need to step it up. Thankfully bong foids (male) should pump those numbers up real soon.
Interesting how in under 20 the peak is 10-14, puberty. Can anyone relate? I can't. I never did such things
This study shows that the incidence of rectal foreign bodies is higher in men and has been increasing over the period studied. Most foreign bodies can be removed trans-anally with the use of anaesthesia, with only a small proportion of patients requiring hospital stay over 24 hours (mean length of stay = 24 hours). Nearly 400 rectal foreign body removals are performed each year with an annual cost of £338,819, illustrating the effect this has on NHS resources.
About 847 bong pounds per removal. Not bad. I wonder if there's one chad who cost like 20,000 pounds to remove a live rat and it totally skewed the average.
Swedes
Retained s*x toys: an increasing and possibly preventable medical condition
We show an increasing incidence in rectal foreign bodies in Swedish national data. The increase was most noticeable in men, and in our local register there was an overrepresentation of s*x toys leading to laparotomy and stoma.
To mitigate surgical cost and comorbidity, policies to decrease the risk of retained s*x toys could be considered.
You don't say...
Probably more papers out there. There's also some drug smuggling element to this. Prisoners shoving phones in their butt, etc. But I'd think that would remain consistent. It's mostly sexual degeneracy.
Conclusion: Practice safe bussy enjoyment by making sure your s*x toy has a very wide end so it can't get lost. Of course, there will still be exceptional cases like with @Holly_Jolly_Kong where his butthole inhales anything in reach. Or if you really must use a random object, use something really long, like a broom handle. And never use random glass objects.
With all these thousands of objects being pulled out of buttholes yearly, I think it would be cool if they had a museum for them. If I was a billionaire, I'd definitely put a couple million towards that. What is the largest? The most marbles? The longest? Etc.
Also, I wonder how many people should have gone to the hospital, but managed to shit an object out 2 weeks later.
rDrama dot net: The webs leading source for bussy news.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Scrotes: the gender lifespan gap is a very serious issue that needs to be considered very seriously
Also scrotes: I wonder if this will fit up my butt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's as much of an issue as most other gender based differences. I personally don't care but will whip it out when somebody brings up something like the wage gap to shut her up. If she handwaves it away, I know she's a bad faith actor too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I just printed out this post and shoved it up my butt
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Carp would have pinned this
Carp would have marked this an effort post
I miss carp
!jannies be more like carp
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a felon and dead?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. !teaparty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
For the migrants' sake, don't let the libs hear this
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
illegal inmyguts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
@Holly_Jolly_Kong you might enjoy one of my posts for once
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Maybe if I stick the second one up there, I'll be able to get them both out
Putting the in
spookieturkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Why have men suddenly become worse at removing objects from their anus?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
shit post.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Come on girls gotta achieve gender equality
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can definitely help
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The real question is what people without prostates get out of shoving things up their butts.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'll just posit that there's a Mr. Hands, but, as far as I know, no Ms. Hands.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Technically speaking it's the guy who jumped off a building to die and a pole thing impaled him from butt to shoulder. It's on wpd. Horrific. He somehow was still alive for about an hour. There's footage after the removal of a doctor holding the object like it's a trophy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Its your bussy dont cheap out on what you put up there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Hmm I wonder what sexuality those males have
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
100% straight
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
check out the butt cancer rates, it's soaring
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Porn websites (which are almost all owned and operated by one large conglomerate corporation) perpetuates that approach / attitude / terminology / culture, by using the term "trap" as titles / tags / labels on porn in which transgender people -- especially transgender women -- feature.
The phenomenon is simply Objectification / Fetishisation.
When women are Objectified and Fetishised, people who participate in that culture are more likely to use violence against women. That's true for cisgender women and transgender women.
There's a large "machismo" patriarchal culture that considers women to be property of men, and considers homosexuality to be worthy of execution, and considers trans women to be simply homosexual men.
There's plenty of people in those cultures who have attraction to trans women -- but who cannot express that openly or publicly.
So they objectify and fetishise trans women in private, via pornography -- without meaningfully interacting with us.
In my opinion, all pornography (as opposed to erotica!) is abnormal, because all pornography perpetuates a culture of objectification, fetishisation, and violence against women. When those abnormal characteristics are comorbid with someone's routine sexual life, they become habitual, and that produces habitual dysfunction.
I did mention as opposed to erotica -- there are cultures that produce erotica that brings human beings together and promotes treating people as human beings with moral autonomy and promotes free human sexual expression.
Snapshots:
Epidemiology and healthcare utilization for rectal foreign bodies in United States adults, 2012–2021:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Rectal foreign body removal: increasing incidence and cost to the NHS:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Retained s*x toys: an increasing and possibly preventable medical condition:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context