The Economist says Zoomers are richer than Millennials were at the same point. :marseyzoomer: :marseycool2:

https://txtify.it/https://econ.trib.al/6LjPIZD

The article behind the paywall

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136325894794755.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136325898932035.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136325902857738.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17136325907168145.webp

https://old.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/1c5wtuq/generation_z_is_unprecedentedly_rich/

A few reddit threads :#marseysmoothbrain:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1c6bs9s/the_economist_generation_z_is_unprecedentedly_rich/

Here are the doomers at lostgeneration :anticommunists:

https://old.reddit.com/r/lostgeneration/comments/119trru/do_you_think_gen_z_will_be_richer_than_millenials/

They will have the most shells and beads in the wasteland, yes.

Bottle caps

:#marseyvault: :#marseysoypoint:

Yes because millennials will be the bosses and we won't frick around with quality of life. Ours has been shit for years. We want better for them

HOW WHOLESOME US MILLENNIALS ARE

!neolibs

118
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If this is true it's probably because of 2008 right?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oldest zoomers are about 28. So that means the oldest ones graduated into a 4% unemployment environment (would be sub 4 within a year) with the S&P averaging 13% returns. There probably hasn't been a better time to start.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oldest zoomers are about 28.

:marseywtf2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Zoomer is defined as between 1997-2009 (sometimes 2010)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.