https://old.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/1dljk4q/ex_twitch_employee_insinuates_the_reason_dr/
LSF IN SHAMBLES AND GLOATING
SLASHER WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG
just go on /r/livestreamfail there are so many threads
Dr Disrespect 
was banned 
from twitch because he sexted 
some minor 
on twitch chat
- 117
- 79
Top Poster of the Day:
kaamrev
Current Registered Users: 26,396
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: cb8e331
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My guess? They were under the belief he was sexting a minor but nothing they could prove or it wasn't true. That is why Disrespect was pursing legal case against them for breach of contract. Both parties settled with NDA because NDA is always good.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Usually there is moral clause. That let you get rid of people. Big corporation like that. It would be crazy of there was no moral clause. And if you want to get rid of someone. You can always pay all they are owned by contract.
Twitch could have banned him. Pay his contract and make statment why he is out of twitch. Doing so would tank is value so competition couldnt benefit. And twitch would look good for taking hard stance against grooming.
Or
They could have put nda contract in front of him and tell him. Sign that and we dont telΓΆ anyone what went down. But you are also out and wont see penny. Dont sign and we go public and fight it in court. Good luck finding law team to argue how we are wrong to fire you for using our platform to groom children. And have fun with Child protective service once news hit air.
What i don't get. If grooming was cause. Why both full NDA and pay out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
NDA is just good business practice. But for the payout probably shows liabilities on twitch side or twitch just doing payout to avoid further ligation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Then that would mean he was grooming kids through twitch is false.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude meeting up at Twitch Con? That sounds just too r-slurred. Why at Twitch Con, at a public place where he is a super known person meeting up with a minor to frick?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those cons are just massive s*x parties for streamers. That is believable. But if there was time, place and text trail. That woild be atrong enough case to fight in court for.
Even if it was she said he said. Shouldn't girl still have some proof of communication. Still dammning.
If there was nothing. And twitch over reacted. Then him being groomer is false story.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There is obliviously some wrongdoing from twitch part against Disrespect. Twitch probably hastily acted on inexact information.
Girl doesn't need any proof of communication. Twitch needs as they are breaking the contract. The outcome of the civil litigation is the only reliable evidence we have that twitch did something that made them liable.
Obliviously the claims against Disrespect could have just turned to law enforcement and had a investigation against him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All im saying, if communication happened. Girl would probably have some proof of it. Like phone number or texts send back and forth. If it was she who came forth. Twitch would then have that too. I just dont belive pedofilia was reason why he was kicked out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Twitch could simply read the chats which could have indicated something. But what the chat logs don't prove is the age of the girl
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context